On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
>
> So in the U.S. your employer can legaly tap your phone, read your email,
> etc, in fact mine does. It's a well stated company policy.
Surely you don't mean your home phone. The wage-slavery system can only go
so far.
--
Thanks,
Uri
http:/
Uri Bruck wrote:
> This is a matter of who owns the resources. It's no different than posing
> limitations on private phone calls on the office phones, or on company
> time. When an employer provides an employee with an email account due to
> the fact that this person is an employee, then this
On 2 Sep 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> IANAL, but IIRC US courts have come to a bizarre conclusion that
> people do not expect the same level of privacy in their electronic
> communications (such as email) as in their conventional communications
> (such as regular mail). This is one of the found
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 12:45, Cedar Cox wrote:
>
> > > Are we the intended recipient ?
> >
> > intended recipient is stricly the person who is listed in the "To:" field.
>
> Then why not send messages
>
> To: All Humanity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ? I think this covers most who will read the me
On Monday 02 September 2002 12:45, Cedar Cox wrote:
> > > Are we the intended recipient ?
> >
> > intended recipient is stricly the person who is listed in the "To:"
> > field.
>
> Then why not send messages
>
> To: All Humanity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ? I think this covers most who will read the
> > Are we the intended recipient ?
>
> intended recipient is stricly the person who is listed in the "To:" field.
Then why not send messages
To: All Humanity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
? I think this covers most who will read the message, through email
or however the archives are viewed.
===
>> Though it's a pretty stiff penalty for Iftach...
yes, It is.
+--- Please ignore the following Crap:
|
V
This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
If you are
"Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +--- Please ignore the following Crap:
I did not. ;-)
> [1] If I remember correctly, it was Rebinu Gershom around the year 1000
> who declared it forbidden to read other people's mail without permission.
> There's no need to say that on every email a
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 00:29, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> >[1] If I remember correctly, it was Rebinu Gershom around the year 1000
> >who declared it forbidden to read other people's mail without permission.
> >
> >
> This argument is flawed because of a perhaps unexpected p
Nadav Har'El wrote:
>[1] If I remember correctly, it was Rebinu Gershom around the year 1000
>who declared it forbidden to read other people's mail without permission.
>
>
This argument is flawed because of a perhaps unexpected point Nadav has
forgotten. While it is true that Gershom forbade r
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002, Amir Tal wrote about "Re: [OT] Looking for jobs":
> bottom line : its not clear, it makes us jumpy - loose it ! or else.. ;)
According to my personal archives (oops, I can be sued!) we already asked
Iftach a year ago (september 2001) to lose this signature on
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002, Guy Cohen wrote about "Re: [OT] Looking for jobs":
> I'm not a lawyer buy im wondering what is their case. Having your
> mail server auto-add a message claiming your message is the property
> of your boss, and adds a "do not touch" sign, ma
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about "Re: [OT] Looking for jobs":
> Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
> > a public mailing list.
>
> While I agree in principle, it may be out
On Sunday 01 September 2002 21:06, Guy Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 08:54:51PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
> > Those things as a way to come back at you when ignored.
> > You don't see the problem now, sure.
> > think of it this way the company this guy works for suddenly wants to get
> > rid
Those things as a way to come back at you when ignored.
You don't see the problem now, sure.
think of it this way the company this guy works for suddenly wants to get
rid of linux-il for whatever reason, what easier way than the sue the hell
out of everyone for archiving the message?
Ely Levy
Sys
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 08:54:51PM +0300, Ely Levy wrote:
> Those things as a way to come back at you when ignored.
> You don't see the problem now, sure.
> think of it this way the company this guy works for suddenly wants to get
> rid of linux-il for whatever reason, what easier way than the sue
On Sunday 01 September 2002 18:29, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On 1 Sep 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > That can make problems with things like archiving/forwarding e-mails to
> > > other people and so on.
> > >
> > > anyhow to whoever archive this list, Puti
On Sunday 01 September 2002 18:35, Guy Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:18:49PM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
> > > a public mailing list.
> >
> > While I agree in principle, it may be
On Sunday 01 September 2002 18:18, you wrote:
> Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
> > a public mailing list.
>
> While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
then he can get a yahoo\hotmail\ whatever account
On Sunday 01 September 2002 19:17, Eliran wrote:
> Ely Levy wrote:
> >>This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
> >>and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
> >>The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
> >>If you are not the intended recipient you
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:18:49PM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
> > a public mailing list.
>
> While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
>
> > That can make problem
On 1 Sep 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That can make problems with things like archiving/forwarding e-mails to
> > other people and so on.
> >
> > anyhow to whoever archive this list, Puting this mail there might get you
> > sued
>
> Assuming the maili
Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I find it very impolite to have this kind of e-mail sent
> a public mailing list.
While I agree in principle, it may be out of control of the sender...
> That can make problems with things like archiving/forwarding e-mails to
> other people and so on.
>
>
Ely Levy wrote:
>>This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
>>and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
>>The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
>>If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use,
>>distribution or copyin
> This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
> and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
> The message may contain privileged or confidential information .
> If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use,
> distribution or copying of this communi
Last comment (but not least) :
Why not using HTML format ? Everyone can read it - a browser is installed
by default with all the popular O.S.
This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
The message may contain privileged or confiden
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote about "Re: [OT] Looking for jobs":
> Anything that you own or have (a job in this case) that you cannot let
> go of, isn't really yours - it owns you. I'm not a very good slave. The
Well spoken.
Though this kind of Buddhist
On Thursday 29 August 2002 12:02, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
> Just my 2 agorot: The looking for job/employee notices are certainly on
> topic, if its a Linux job you are looking for, or offering.
yes they are, CV's "HOWTO's" are not.
tal.
>
> - yba
>
> Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> >>off list
>
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 10:19, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > > One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word
> > > format also, those HR departments love it as .doc and not as .pdf ;)
> >
> > and thats relevant to the list because?
> >
>
> Because NONE of the HR departments ar
On Thursday 29 August 2002 12:56, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> > off list
> >
> > this is not an excuse.
> >
> > many off topics run on this list and i personaly thinks that most of them
> > are very intresting and helping the linux community.
>
> we can argue about this forever.
> some "OT's" are rel
On Thursday 29 August 2002 13:19, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > > One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word
> > > format also, those HR departments love it as .doc and not as .pdf ;)
> >
> > and thats relevant to the list because?
>
> Because NONE of the HR departments ar
> > One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word
> > format also, those HR departments love it as .doc and not as .pdf ;)
>
> and thats relevant to the list because?
>
Because NONE of the HR departments are accepting PDF! and if someone wants to
find a job, he better
Just my 2 agorot: The looking for job/employee notices are certainly on topic,
if its a Linux job you are looking for, or offering.
- yba
Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
>>off list
>>
>>this is not an excuse.
>>
>>many off topics run on this list and i personaly thinks that most of them
>>are very in
> off list
>
> this is not an excuse.
>
> many off topics run on this list and i personaly thinks that most of them
> are very intresting and helping the linux community.
we can argue about this forever.
some "OT's" are relevant, some dont.
i dont see any connection between a CV format and someth
Actually he has a point. Consider who's receiving CVs nowadays.
It's quite possible an entire office doesn't have Acrobat Reader installed,
or at least most of them don't have it..
Just a thought tho
Eli
PS.
On a personal note, I doubt you'll have trouble finding a job with what you
know, so do
This is Relevant as such tips help Linux people to advance and by advancing
they take linux step by step to recognation
> One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word
format
> also, those HR departments love it as .doc and not as .pdf ;)
and thats relevant to the list bec
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 20:57, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Gilad,
>
> as much as I "know" you - you'll find a job pretty quicly (although
> salleries are pretty low right now - a good kernel programmer gets about
> 15-18k nis bruto)
>
> One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume t
Gilad,
as much as I "know" you - you'll find a job pretty quicly (although salleries
are pretty low right now - a good kernel programmer gets about 15-18k nis
bruto)
One thing that you might want to do - is convert your resume to Word format
also, those HR departments love it as .doc and not
38 matches
Mail list logo
