Re: QT/KDE legal stuff

2001-03-02 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Hi, On Friday 02 March 2001 01:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > in #kde. they told me that's OK to sell closed sourced KDE programs. But > they did not mention a thing about QT. So KDE is free because QT is not? > - diego Diego, you're mixing 2 things: QT have 2 licenses - GPL and QPL The G

Re: QT/KDE legal stuff

2001-03-01 Thread dgi_il
ent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 12:46 AM Subject: Re: QT/KDE legal stuff > No no, it doesn't go like this... > > If you're writing a commercial program with QT - then you'll have to buy the > commercial QT and work with it to create your application. There are 2 > versions

Re: QT/KDE legal stuff

2001-03-01 Thread Ely Levy
how come? you would if you for example staticlly link with them?? that what LGPL was trying to prevant no? Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: | So what? | | As long as you don't modify the source code of KDE itself - then you

Re: QT/KDE legal stuff

2001-03-01 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
So what? As long as you don't modify the source code of KDE itself - then you don't have to give sources.. Ely Levy wrote: > > and I always thought KDE libs are GNU licenced.. > > Ely Levy > System group > Hebrew University > Jerusalem Israel > -- Hetz Ben Hamo Hardware Research dept. Adu

Re: QT/KDE legal stuff

2001-03-01 Thread Ely Levy
license, but that is all. | > | > Oded | > | > -- | > SCCS, the source motel! Programs check in and never check out! | >-- Ken Thompson | > | > - Original Message - | > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > Sent: Wednesday, Fe

Re: QT/KDE legal stuff

2001-03-01 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: QT/KDE legal stuff": > This is just plain untrue. > > You can make a KDE compliant application and sell it, without any problem, > as long as you also distribute the source (and not necesarily for free - > it's lega

Re: QT/KDE legal stuff

2001-02-28 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 12:05 > Subject: QT/KDE legal stuff > > > I started writing a commercial program, and I wanted to do a *nix version > > also. So naturally I started QT Designer and started drawing the app > >

Re: QT/KDE legal stuff

2001-02-28 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
No no, it doesn't go like this... If you're writing a commercial program with QT - then you'll have to buy the commercial QT and work with it to create your application. There are 2 versions - one for Windows and one for most unices (Linux/BSD/Solaris etc..) Now - regarding KDE - no one forces

Re: QT/KDE legal stuff

2001-02-28 Thread Oded Arbel
Wednesday, February 28, 2001 12:05 Subject: QT/KDE legal stuff > I started writing a commercial program, and I wanted to do a *nix version > also. So naturally I started QT Designer and started drawing the app dialogs > and then I understood that I cannot really make it KDE... since KDE

QT/KDE legal stuff

2001-02-28 Thread dgi_il
I started writing a commercial program, and I wanted to do a *nix version also. So naturally I started QT Designer and started drawing the app dialogs and then I understood that I cannot really make it KDE... since KDE will force me to publish the sources of that program. As a definition my progra