Re: Q: Interesting memory usage stat's

2000-05-29 Thread Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo
IK>> Now, how my Linux manages to go into 2MB swap, with 160MB physical RAM, IK>> 70MB of them in buffers is still a mystery to me ... yet another IK>> optimization consideration? :) Very simple. Unused processes are better in swap. Look how many mgetty's you have? How ofter you use them? What ab

RE: Q: Interesting memory usage stat's

2000-05-29 Thread Chen Shapira
> Now, how my Linux manages to go into 2MB swap, with 160MB > physical RAM, > 70MB of them in buffers is still a mystery to me ... yet another > optimization consideration? :) But ofcourse. Suppose you open an app that is very heavy on memory usage. Sure enough - almost everything is thrown int

Re: Q: Interesting memory usage stat's

2000-05-29 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 01:06:10PM +0300, Ira Abramov wrote: > and I have a slightly related Q... lately I needed to hand in a few Java > Applets as excercises for school, I sadly turned on Java support in > Netscape, knowing it will get it stuck (and it does get stuck a lot, > eating 99% of the C

Re: Q: Interesting memory usage stat's

2000-05-28 Thread Omer Efraim
Ira Abramov wrote: > > the problem is that many times the netscape process leaks over 200Meg of > swap, but it remains "used" once I kill the process. the RAM is freed, > but the machine is heavy as hell because it won't free up the swap and > swap back in all the other apps. > > any idea how I

Re: Q: Interesting memory usage stat's

2000-05-28 Thread Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo
IA>> the problem is that many times the netscape process leaks over 200Meg of IA>> swap, but it remains "used" once I kill the process. the RAM is freed, IA>> but the machine is heavy as hell because it won't free up the swap and IA>> swap back in all the other apps. IA>> any idea how I force the

Re: Q: Interesting memory usage stat's

2000-05-28 Thread Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo
NF>> 1) Why is memory usage so high when it shouldn't be? NF>> Note: looking at the process that are running (most httpd), they don't NF>> amount to much more that 30mb. Actually, in ideal case memory usage should be 100%. Why you need memory that isn't used? If it isn't used by the processes, OS

Fw: Q: Interesting memory usage stat's

2000-05-28 Thread Nathan Fain
hives (maybe someone will find it helpful). - N - Original Message - From: "Tzafrir Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nathan Fain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 2:26 PM Subject: Re: Q: Interesting memory usage stat's > On Sun, 28 May 200

Re: Q: Interesting memory usage stat's

2000-05-28 Thread Ira Abramov
On Sun, 28 May 2000, Nathan Fain wrote: > Just recently I started generating graph's of system resource usage on some > of my linux machines.On a certain group of machines I noticed a steady > level of between 90% and 100% memory usage (while at the same time, swap and I have a slightly related

Q: Interesting memory usage stat's

2000-05-28 Thread Nathan Fain
Just recently I started generating graph's of system resource usage on some of my linux machines. On a certain group of machines I noticed a steady level of between 90% and 100% memory usage (while at the same time, swap usage remains flat at 0%). Here is an example of what top shows on this Red