Ira Abramov wrote:
you know the type, lots of random text and the spam is in an attachment
that changes ever so slightly to avoid getting a unique signature for
razor/pyzor and friends.
the only option is of course to authorize with a while list, like I saw
some services have. first time yo
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 09:27 +0200, guy keren wrote:
> i think that you have to give up some of the paranoya (i'm going to
> block the e-mail that'll change my life!) in order to get good
> filtering.
Its a different kind of paranoia when you're a service provider (and may
I say - a bit more legiti
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006, Micha Silver wrote about "Re: Picture spams - again.":
> After compaints started to mount up from users, I decided to try
> greylisting.
>..
> I don't know how long this improvement will hold out, but so far I'm
> pleased.
The problem wit
Ira Abramov wrote:
you know the type, lots of random text and the spam is in an attachment
that changes ever so slightly to avoid getting a unique signature for
razor/pyzor and friends.
.
what do YOU do to fight this? the smartest filter I know is Google's and
even IT fails on some spams e
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006, Ira Abramov wrote about "Re: Picture spams - again.":
> well, care to share that list of usefull RBLs? I'm always afraid to
> block too much, and someone else's experiance with specific RBLs' record
> is valueable.
Here is the list of RBLs
the moment you publish anything on the web in a non-anonymous way - this
becomes useless.
i had a hoard of image spams here in the last few month, and about 3
weeks ago most of them were gone. i think someone in my ISP changed
their anti-spam software or setup.
i think that you have to give up s
On 27/11/06, Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Oded Arbel, from the post of Sun, 26 Nov:
> I'm using bogofilter as the last line of defense. The first line is a
> large list of RBLs, including my own RBL with which I aggressively block
> dynamic IP pools (in addition to specific spa
Quoting Oded Arbel, from the post of Sun, 26 Nov:
> I'm using bogofilter as the last line of defense. The first line is a
> large list of RBLs, including my own RBL with which I aggressively block
> dynamic IP pools (in addition to specific spammers, mostly Israeli, who
> aren't blocked by spamhaus
On 11/26/06, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I catch almost all of the remaining spam with a set of home-brewed huristics
which suite my needs.
I used to have checks like this. I'd be ensuring my bug-tracker email
was receiving only messages originating from bug-trackers, etc. but
that'
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006, Ira Abramov wrote about "Picture spams - again.":
> the only option is of course to authorize with a while list, like I saw
> some services have. first time you send me and Email I make sure you are
> human with a return mail to a URL with captcha, and y
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 19:35 +0200, Ira Abramov wrote:
> you know the type, lots of random text and the spam is in an attachment
> that changes ever so slightly to avoid getting a unique signature for
> razor/pyzor and friends.
As mentioned by Peter, bogofilter still does a pretty decent job with
t
bogofilter is not confused by this. If you want good results you have to
run bogofilter separately for each user. There is no other way. I
sometimes get false negatives but nothing comes through. The bogo
database is only 2.8M and it has been running here unmodified for a year
or so.
Peter
On 11/26/06, Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I looked into the text of some of those (got hundreds if not thousands a
day to choose from) and the text is also very topical. this bit of spam
seems obviousely designed for an OSS person (as in, harvested from a web
archive of a technical mail
you know the type, lots of random text and the spam is in an attachment
that changes ever so slightly to avoid getting a unique signature for
razor/pyzor and friends.
I looked into the text of some of those (got hundreds if not thousands a
day to choose from) and the text is also very topical. thi
14 matches
Mail list logo
