Re: OT: lemming0

2001-12-02 Thread Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:11:02PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2001, Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader wrote about "Re: OT: >lemming0": > > 172.16/16 > > Actually, it's 172.16/12, and 172.22.3.2 is indeed in it (see RFC 1918, > "Ad

Re: OT: lemming0

2001-12-02 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001, Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader wrote about "Re: OT: lemming0": > On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:23:15AM +0200, Cedar Cox wrote: > > Sorry for being OT, but this one is really easy. I just want to make sure > > I'm not missing something ;) Is

Re: OT: lemming0

2001-12-02 Thread Alex Shnitman
Hi, Official! On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 12:55:19AM +0200, you wrote the following: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:23:15AM +0200, Cedar Cox wrote: > > Sorry for being OT, but this one is really easy. I just want to make sure > > I'm not missing something ;) Isn't 172.22.3.2 in the reserved networks

Re: OT: lemming0

2001-12-01 Thread Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:23:15AM +0200, Cedar Cox wrote: > Sorry for being OT, but this one is really easy. I just want to make sure > I'm not missing something ;) Isn't 172.22.3.2 in the reserved networks > address range? Is this just a misconfigured DNS (leuni-karlsruhe.de's)? > I got the

OT: lemming0

2001-12-01 Thread Cedar Cox
Sorry for being OT, but this one is really easy. I just want to make sure I'm not missing something ;) Isn't 172.22.3.2 in the reserved networks address range? Is this just a misconfigured DNS (leuni-karlsruhe.de's)? I got the address from a link on the gimp.org web page.. cedarc:~$ nslookup