On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 02:35:32AM +0200, guy keren wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:04:29AM +0200, guy keren wrote:
> > > A. there is no "BSD SunOS". there is "BSD", and there is "SunOS". i assume
> > > you're refering to SunOS
> >
> > No
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:04:29AM +0200, guy keren wrote:
> > A. there is no "BSD SunOS". there is "BSD", and there is "SunOS". i assume
> > you're refering to SunOS
>
> No need to be harsh.
i think you're confusing 'harsh' and 'precise'.
> SunO
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:04:29AM +0200, guy keren wrote:
> A. there is no "BSD SunOS". there is "BSD", and there is "SunOS". i assume
> you're refering to SunOS
No need to be harsh. SunOS 4 was based on BSD, and SunOS 5+, aka
Solaris 2+, is based on SysV. And I am pretty sure you know this.
I fi
