Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-28 Thread Shoshannah Forbes
Oops, sorry, I accidentally tested this on a Redhat 7.2 (!), on which I had kdebase-2.2.2. I will check it on Redhat 8.0 later tonight. If Konqueror can show Niqqud, it's great news :) On KDE 3.1 /MDK 9 it can display Hebrew diacritics, albit with slight positiong problems (for example, the diacr

Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-28 Thread Shoshannah Forbes
>>Can anybody else confirm this? Was anybody able to view Niqqud correctly on Mozilla? For an example, try it on Genesis 1: Mozilla's diacritics support varies widely between platform- the best is on Widows, the worst on Mac (Linux is in the middle), althugh none is perfect. Here are a few ope

Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-27 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote about "Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need > tool for high quality typeset...)": > > Oops, sorry, I accidentally tested this on a Redhat 7.2 (!), on which I > > had kdebas

Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-27 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote about "Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)": > Oops, sorry, I accidentally tested this on a Redhat 7.2 (!), on which I > had kdebase-2.2.2. I will check it on Redhat 8.0 later tonight. > If Konquer

Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-27 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
> Perfect?? For me, it couldn't look worse. I see no Hebrew letters or > niqqud, just squares... I'm using Konqueror on Redhat 8.0 > (kdebase-2.2.2-1). Maybe a later release of Konqueror fixed this issue? kdebase-2.2.2??? in RedHat 8.0? do you mean RedHat 7.0? KDE-3.1 should show it well.. Thank

Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-27 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Meir Kriheli wrote about "Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)": > > Perfect?? For me, it couldn't look worse. I see no Hebrew letters or > > niqqud, just squares... I'm using Konqueror on Redhat 8.0 >

Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-27 Thread Eli Segal
I see squares with Internet Explorer also (Not all squares ... one in every word) - Original Message - From: "Meir Kriheli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:50 PM Subject: Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool fo

Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-27 Thread Meir Kriheli
On Thursday 27 February 2003 13:21, Nadav Har'El wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)": > > > 1. http://www.mechon-mamre.org/c/ct/c0101.htm > > >with Hebrew only &

Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-27 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)": > > I use "Mozilla 1.3a: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; > > rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212" > > > > I looked at tw

Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-27 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
> I use "Mozilla 1.3a: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; > rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212" > > I looked at two pages because they show different behavior: > > 1. http://www.mechon-mamre.org/c/ct/c0101.htm >with Hebrew only Looks perfect on Konqueror. I hope the win32 version of the KHTM

Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)

2003-02-27 Thread Daniel Daboul
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 06:24:14PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2003, Matitiahu Allouche wrote about "Re: need tool for high quality > typesetting, unicode-capable": > > As far as I remember, the problem is not entirely (or maybe at all) with > > the Mozilla display engine but with