Oops, sorry, I accidentally tested this on a Redhat 7.2 (!), on which I
had kdebase-2.2.2. I will check it on Redhat 8.0 later tonight.
If Konqueror can show Niqqud, it's great news :)
On KDE 3.1 /MDK 9 it can display Hebrew diacritics, albit with slight
positiong problems (for example, the diacr
>>Can anybody else confirm this? Was anybody able to view Niqqud
correctly on
Mozilla? For an example, try it on Genesis 1:
Mozilla's diacritics support varies widely between platform- the best is
on Widows, the worst on Mac (Linux is in the middle), althugh none is
perfect.
Here are a few ope
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote about "Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need
> tool for high quality typeset...)":
> > Oops, sorry, I accidentally tested this on a Redhat 7.2 (!), on which I
> > had kdebas
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote about "Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need
tool for high quality typeset...)":
> Oops, sorry, I accidentally tested this on a Redhat 7.2 (!), on which I
> had kdebase-2.2.2. I will check it on Redhat 8.0 later tonight.
> If Konquer
> Perfect?? For me, it couldn't look worse. I see no Hebrew letters or
> niqqud, just squares... I'm using Konqueror on Redhat 8.0
> (kdebase-2.2.2-1). Maybe a later release of Konqueror fixed this issue?
kdebase-2.2.2??? in RedHat 8.0? do you mean RedHat 7.0? KDE-3.1 should show it
well..
Thank
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Meir Kriheli wrote about "Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need
tool for high quality typeset...)":
> > Perfect?? For me, it couldn't look worse. I see no Hebrew letters or
> > niqqud, just squares... I'm using Konqueror on Redhat 8.0
>
I see squares with Internet Explorer also
(Not all squares ... one in every word)
- Original Message -
From: "Meir Kriheli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need tool fo
On Thursday 27 February 2003 13:21, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was
Re: need tool for high quality typeset...)":
> > > 1. http://www.mechon-mamre.org/c/ct/c0101.htm
> > >with Hebrew only
&
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote about "Re: Niqud in Mozilla (was Re: need
tool for high quality typeset...)":
> > I use "Mozilla 1.3a: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
> > rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212"
> >
> > I looked at tw
> I use "Mozilla 1.3a: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
> rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212"
>
> I looked at two pages because they show different behavior:
>
> 1. http://www.mechon-mamre.org/c/ct/c0101.htm
>with Hebrew only
Looks perfect on Konqueror. I hope the win32 version of the KHTM
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 06:24:14PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003, Matitiahu Allouche wrote about "Re: need tool for high quality
> typesetting, unicode-capable":
> > As far as I remember, the problem is not entirely (or maybe at all) with
> > the Mozilla display engine but with
11 matches
Mail list logo