Re: NAT and Masquerading

1999-03-11 Thread Semion Lisyansky
At 11:43 AM 3/11/99 +0200, Vadim Smelyansky wrote: >SL>/sbin/ipnatadm -O -i -W eth1 -S -M >SL>/sbin/ipnatadm -I -i -W eth1 -D -N > ipnatadm have not an -b (bidirect rule) option? it has, but since I still playing with it same with ipchains rules > > > What exactly you can not

Re: NAT and Masquerading

1999-03-11 Thread Vadim Smelyansky
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Semion Lisyansky wrote: SL>well, theese are not unices, actually part of them even not computers nice :) SL>Ok, that's more or less what I'm doing. Somehow I've reached about SL>6-8 rule records per host/port - input/output/forward chains, static NAT SL>rules, aliasi

Re: NAT and Masquerading

1999-03-11 Thread Semion Lisyansky
At 09:49 AM 3/11/99 +0200, Vadim Smelyansky wrote: > > telnet, hmm... why not at least ssh? or you have sslay telnetd >installed? well, theese are not unices, actually part of them even not computers > I think you can do this without patch >just make an alias of external interface (

Re: NAT and Masquerading

1999-03-11 Thread Vadim Smelyansky
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Semion Lisyansky wrote: SL>Now supose that few of hosts on your private net need to SL>be accessed from Internet - not only one WWW and one SL>FTP so You couldn't use port mapping and redirection SL>technique, but some more hosts providing same service. Why not just a

Re: NAT and Masquerading

1999-03-10 Thread Semion Lisyansky
bly IP Masq) and the static one. Best Regards Shimon Lisyansky -Original Message- From: Ira Abramov - Scalable Solutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, March 11, 1999 5:14 AM Subj

Re: NAT and Masquerading

1999-03-10 Thread Ira Abramov - Scalable Solutions
Today, Semion Lisyansky blurbed: > >NAT and IP Masquerading is the same thing. > > When I told NAT I meant the static NAT. I use IP NAT patch > originally written by Michael Hassenstein for kernels 2.0.x > and then ported to later kernel versions. IP Masquerading > implements the dynamic NAT

Re: NAT and Masquerading

1999-03-10 Thread Semion Lisyansky
At 04:26 PM 3/10/99 +0200, you wrote: > >NAT and IP Masquerading is the same thing. When I told NAT I meant the static NAT. I use IP NAT patch originally written by Michael Hassenstein for kernels 2.0.x and then ported to later kernel versions. IP Masquerading implements the dynamic NAT only. >

Re: NAT and Masquerading

1999-03-10 Thread Guy Cohen
Yes, NAT and Masq are the same, If you can send some usefull information to the list, you would get planty of help, as Linux Masq is a well documented subject. information needed as to how you have compiled the kernel, what firewall you are using for the masq, your routing table, etc. Reg.

Re: NAT and Masquerading

1999-03-10 Thread Shachar Tal
NAT and IP Masquerading is the same thing. On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Semion Lisyansky wrote: > Hi List, > > I am trying to implement solution that uses both - IP NAT and > IP Masquerading with kernel 2.2.x - without great success. > Is someone have an experience with this issue? Can it work > toge

NAT and Masquerading

1999-03-10 Thread Semion Lisyansky
Hi List, I am trying to implement solution that uses both - IP NAT and IP Masquerading with kernel 2.2.x - without great success. Is someone have an experience with this issue? Can it work together at all? Best Regards Shimon Lisyansky