Re: Multiple GLIBCs

2003-07-03 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Isaac Aaron wrote: Hi Gilad I tried the dual installation of glibc-2.2 and glibc-2.3. rpm -ivh fails the upgrade because the depend on their glibc-common packages (which don't want each other whatsoever). When I installed glibc with --nodeps I got a fine list of file conflicts. It seems like it

RE: Multiple GLIBCs

2003-07-03 Thread Isaac Aaron
2003 11:28 AM > To: Isaac Aaron > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Multiple GLIBCs > > > Isaac Aaron wrote: > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:5

Re: Multiple GLIBCs

2003-07-03 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Isaac Aaron wrote: Hi List Running Red Hat 7.3 requires me to recompile everything I want from Red Hat 9 (or that is avaliable to Red Hat) before I install it. I'm looking for a way to co-install GLIBC 2.3 with the existing GLIBC 2.1. Any opinions? No problem at all. Linux (like other Un*x like

RE: Multiple GLIBCs

2003-07-03 Thread Isaac Aaron
> -Original Message- > From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:56 AM > To: Isaac Aaron > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Multiple GLIBCs > > > Isaac Aaron wrote: > > Hi List > > > >

Re: Multiple GLIBCs

2003-07-03 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Isaac Aaron wrote: -Original Message- From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:56 AM To: Isaac Aaron Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Multiple GLIBCs Isaac Aaron wrote: Hi List Running Red Hat 7.3 requires me to recompile everything I want

RE: Multiple GLIBCs

2003-07-03 Thread Iftach Hyams
>> I'm looking for a way to co-install GLIBC 2.3 with the >> existing GLIBC 2.1. >> Any opinions? Since you can control all GCC's flags from environment variables you should add to your profile a menu to choose what compilation environment you like (and set it to the prompt or title of the termina

Re: Multiple GLIBCs

2003-07-02 Thread Gilboa Davara
the .so files on both cases have different extensions. (libc-2.2.x.so vs. libc-2.3.2). However, the problem will be the main libc.so symbolic link. (You'll have to decide who gets the main symbolic link) Forgive my stupid question... but why not upgrade to RH9 and save the trouble? Gilboa On Thu

Multiple GLIBCs

2003-07-02 Thread Isaac Aaron
Hi List Running Red Hat 7.3 requires me to recompile everything I want from Red Hat 9 (or that is avaliable to Red Hat) before I install it. I'm looking for a way to co-install GLIBC 2.3 with the existing GLIBC 2.1. Any opinions? Thanks, Isaac (Itzik) Aaron ==