On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 15:17, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >
> I brought that example up. He was not impressed. Apparently, Clalit
> went, succesfully, through a court proceeding to enforce such a
> settelment without even having the actual source mentioned in a contract.
>
There are two issues: Wri
ications used by the company - what is
the source of this misunderstanding?
Rony
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shachar Shemesh
> Sent: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:48
> To: Linux-IL mailing list
> Subject: Meeting with G
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
One note:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:47:43AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Now, I tried to point the practical reasons behind the social contract,
and his response rather suprised me. Basically, he has contracts with
all of his software vendors that gives him full acces
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
And no, Didi, I don't think even Clalit have source code access to
Windows, but I am sure they have a support contract with redmond and a
few MSCEs on staff.
Whatever they have with Clalit makes them comfertable enough.
I agree that this, under no stretch of imagination,
Yedidyah Bar-David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > and his response rather suprised me. Basically, he has contracts with
> > all of his software vendors that gives him full access to the source
> > code in case the company goes under. His basic premesis was "I can get
> > competition over suppo
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
-Original Message-
From: Tzafrir Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:25 PM
To: Linux-IL mailing list
Subject: Re: Meeting with Gadi Gilon
>
http://www.newsforge.com/software/03/10/18/1814211.shtml?tid=132&tid=82&
One note:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:47:43AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Now, I tried to point the practical reasons behind the social contract,
> and his response rather suprised me. Basically, he has contracts with
> all of his software vendors that gives him full access to the source
>
-Original Message-
From: Shlomi Fish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Shachar Shemesh
Cc: Linux-IL mailing list
Subject: Re: Meeting with Gadi Gilon
> I'm fine with it. Albeit, it could turn into a one against many flame-war.
Then we'
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Just came back from a meeting with Gadi Gilon. For those who don't
> remeber, he is the CIO of "Kupat Cholim Klalit". He stumbled upon the
> last time his name was mentioned on this list (thre
Hi,
First, I want to say that this is one of the most interesting emails
I read recently.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:47:43AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Just came back from a meeting with Gadi Gilon. For those who don't
> remeber, he is the CIO of "Ku
.
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 10:47, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Just came back from a meeting with Gadi Gilon. For those who don't
> remeber, he is the CIO of "Kupat Cholim Klalit". He stumbled upon the
> last time his name was mentioned on this list (thre
Hi list,
Just came back from a meeting with Gadi Gilon. For those who don't
remeber, he is the CIO of "Kupat Cholim Klalit". He stumbled upon the
last time his name was mentioned on this list (thread starting at
http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Linux/maillists/03/09/msg00
12 matches
Mail list logo
