On Tue, May 15, 2001, Yoni S wrote about "Masquerading problem":
> when I try to configure the network masquerading with
> the ipchains 1.3.9, trying:
> ipchains -A FORWARD -s 172.25.25.0/255.255.255.0 -d
> 0.0.0.0/0 -j MASQ
> it says:
> "ipchains: No targe
Hello.
I have SuSE 7.0 linux and I compiled Kernel 2.2.19
with the following Networking options:
Packet socket
Kernel/User netlink socket
Routing messages
network firewalls
socket Filtering
Unix domain sockets
TCP/IP netowrking
IP: advanced router
IP: verbose route monitoring
IP: firewalling
IP:
Hi List,
Mulix and Sagi were correct.
It was the MTU problem, and my mistake was that I didn't reboot the Win2K
client after changing the MTU.
It now WORKS...
Thanks everybody
Eyal
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, root wrote:
> Hi Sagi
>
> The MTU on the clients _is_ 1452. That doesn't change anything.
> (FTP-ing a big file works. This problem is HTTP specific and has
> nothing to do with the packet size.)
i very much doubt that. your problem sounds exactly like the MTU
problem. what
Hi Eran,
I found out why the second command didn't work - I was missing a module
- ipt_state.o .
That was the good news...
After adding the module, rebooting, reconnecting and running the
iptables commands, it still doesn't work.
Any other ideas???
Eyal
Eran Levy wrote:
> Hi Eyal,
> chec
proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> > >
> > > After which all my client machines ( Win2k and win98 ) can successfully
> > > ping to the internet, use irc, ftp and everything EXCEPT http.
> > > When I try to use HTTP I can see the information leave (via tcpdump) and I
> &
an see that there is a reply from the http server, but it never reaches
> > the client machine.
> >
> > On the linux box itself every network service works, so I think that this
> > is a masquerading problem.
> >
> > I get the exact same behaviour using ipchains
but it never reaches
> the client machine.
>
> On the linux box itself every network service works, so I think that this
> is a masquerading problem.
>
> I get the exact same behaviour using ipchains on a 2.2.16 kernel.
> The distribution I am using is Redhat 7.0.
>
> The o
Hi Eyal,
check this website for a script of Ira Abromov:
http://ira.abramov.org/linux/dialnetfilter.init.html
this is a firewall/MASQ script. I dont know why the second line
from my script didnt work to you with the --state INVALID,NEW option but
I think that Ira's script will work.
At 16:35 13/
I don't have any firewall set up at all.
Eran Levy wrote:
> One more thing: Do you have any firewall that blocked any http service?
>
>
> Regards,
> Eran Levy.
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> WebSite: http://come.to/liloboot
>
> ===
age-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eyal Harpaz
> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 3:08 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Masquerading problem with ADSL
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> &
One more thing: Do you have any firewall that blocked any http service?
Regards,
Eran Levy.
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WebSite: http://come.to/liloboot
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscri
8 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Masquerading problem with ADSL
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have successfully connected to the ISP using the ADSL-HOWTO on iglu, but
> I am unable to masquerade any HTTP (specifically HTTP, everything else
> works OK) connections.
&g
x box itself every network service works, so I think that this
>is a masquerading problem.
>
>I get the exact same behaviour using ipchains on a 2.2.16 kernel.
>The distribution I am using is Redhat 7.0.
>
>The one thing that really bothers me is that when I telnet to a HTTP
>s
via tcpdump) and I
can see that there is a reply from the http server, but it never reaches
the client machine.
On the linux box itself every network service works, so I think that this
is a masquerading problem.
I get the exact same behaviour using ipchains on a 2.2.16 kernel.
The distribution I am us
15 matches
Mail list logo
