On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Well, let me tell you this:
>
> Most of Wine developers are hired by those companies who develop wine -
> Transgaming, Code-Weavers, and I think Lindows got some people too
>
> So far - Transgaming & Code Weavers have contributed lots of work. Just
Well, let me tell you this:
Most of Wine developers are hired by those companies who develop wine -
Transgaming, Code-Weavers, and I think Lindows got some people too
So far - Transgaming & Code Weavers has contributed lots of work. Just
recently transgaming had contributed the major speed
Just to throw another current ridiculous-sounding trademark case into
the pile (much more ridiculous that [LW]indows IMHO, but IANAL):
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/23614.html
The Reg makes it sound like a pure blackmail that was not worth SuSE's
while to go to court about.
--
Oleg G
For those of you who don't read Slashdot, here's a link to a very
interesting story on the subject.
http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/opinion/columns/dg010902.htm
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "uns
Donno if you read the digest (I'm subscribed to the lists) - but the
flamewars have been ended. License stays as it is.
Hetz
On Wednesday 09 January 2002 16:29, Adi Stav wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:32:13PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > Now - my "educated" guess that there was a group
On Monday 07 January 2002 21:25, Daniel Feiglin wrote:
> After looking over the site, my immediate thoughts were, "Vapourware" and
> "scam". But if so, why is Microsoft sueing them? Possible answer: Provoke
> Microsoft into a legal situation to draw atention. If Gates thinks Lindows
> is important
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote about "RE: Lindows screenshots":
> yeah,
> I wonder if they'll sue if you will make a company called shitows because it sounds
>similar and
> might be violating their trademark.
No, but with such a product name you'
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Oleg Goldshmidt
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lindows screenshots
Daniel Feiglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After looking over the site, my immediate thoughts were, "Vapourware"
> an
Daniel Feiglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After looking over the site, my immediate thoughts were, "Vapourware"
> and "scam". But if so, why is Microsoft sueing them?
IIRC, M$ are suing for trademark violation. If that is right, then it
does not matter whether Lindows does anything at all or
> From: "Ira Abramov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 8:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Lindows screenshots
>
>
>
>>On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Well, pay upfront $99
On Monday 07 January 2002 07:04, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> They have a sourge force site, I did not find any d/l beta, source or
> binary, are they some ghost company they want wannabe? (see freedows, open
> windows project etc...)
>
> - diego
>
sourcefoge site? url please..
as for what they do
nt: Sunday, January 06, 2002 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: Lindows screenshots
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
>
> > Well, pay upfront $99 to be an "insider". So is this a good money-making
> > scheme or something real ? Especially since I didn't find anythi
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
> Well, pay upfront $99 to be an "insider". So is this a good money-making
> scheme or something real ? Especially since I didn't find anything
> technical on the site during a quick browse over the top menus.
yeah, I like the fact they write a "FAQ" s
Well, pay upfront $99 to be an "insider". So is this a good money-making
scheme or something real ? Especially since I didn't find anything
technical on the site during a quick browse over the top menus.
Schlomo
PS: And we all know the existing technologies like WINE
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Hetz
Hi all,
You might want to take a look at the following screenshots:
http://www.lindows.com/screenshots
As you can see - this is Lindows OS running natively Internet Explorer and
Office (I think it's 2000 or XP - not sure, I don't remember how Office XP
looks). You can also see that it runs na
15 matches
Mail list logo
