[Fwd: Lilo question - resolved

2001-06-21 Thread fredy
Ok problem resolved ...finally. For those who will have the problem in the future...i just cant believe i'm the only one with this shit :) attached is my current working lilo.conf. The advice on adding the lines of disk=... was indeed very helpfull, the catch was to try many versions of it

Re: Lilo question

2001-06-20 Thread milesteg
Just out of curiosity .. do you have the linux hd configured as a SECONDARY slave without a master? -= Miles Teg -=- Understanding kills ambition; Dominance? Submission! =- = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with th

Re: Lilo question

2001-06-20 Thread fredy
> well, I tried it with values 0x81 and 0x80 I got the same results. thanks :) any other ideas ? > > In my experience, lilo is the most (or only) difficult part of linux > installation. > > But if you want help, you need to provide information, how many disks, > how are they connected, how

Re: [Fwd: Re: Lilo question]

2001-06-20 Thread Matan Ziv-Av
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, fredy wrote: > ok the system is based on: > > SE440BX-2 motherboard (currently with the P15 BIOS version) , PIII CPU > 450, 256 MB RAM, 2 HD - 15GB WD(Win2K) and 4.3 GB Quantom (Linux). > 1st IDE: WD HD > 2nd IDE: CD-ROM *52 (SM) >Quantom HD (SS). > the 2nd HD was a

[Fwd: Re: Lilo question]

2001-06-20 Thread fredy
ok the system is based on: SE440BX-2 motherboard (currently with the P15 BIOS version) , PIII CPU 450, 256 MB RAM, 2 HD - 15GB WD(Win2K) and 4.3 GB Quantom (Linux). 1st IDE: WD HD 2nd IDE: CD-ROM *52 (SM) Quantom HD (SS). the 2nd HD was a PS but it had the same results i say agai

Re: Lilo question

2001-06-20 Thread Matan Ziv-Av
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, fredy wrote: > I downgraded my bios from P17 to P15...meaning two generations, dating a > year back... > still the same results. > This is stopping to be interesting and begins to be annoying. > I'de love to hear any ideas. > Has anyone had these problems before (With Win2K o

Re: Lilo question

2001-06-20 Thread fredy
Ok. I downgraded my bios from P17 to P15...meaning two generations, dating a year back... still the same results. This is stopping to be interesting and begins to be annoying. I'de love to hear any ideas. Has anyone had these problems before (With Win2K or linux)? and if so how were they solved?

Re: Lilo question

2001-06-20 Thread fredy
Basically what it means is that my BIOS has problems with the HD's... I just upgraded to the latest version of my bios, it solved a few problems i had before (liek it not being able to boot from CD).. If it is true then I have to downgrade the bios... which is an interesting task on its own... A

Lilo question

2001-06-20 Thread fredy
Hi list. I just finished installing a new linux system (RH7.1 based). the system was installed on a new HD which is currently configured as a secondary slave on a PIII machine with SE440BX-2 motherboard. I'm having a few problems here: 1. A bit off topic but might be related, the PM HD is a 15GB

Re: lilo question

1999-11-01 Thread Micha Feigin
What you need to do is change lilo.conf, and then just run lilo as root (under my distro there is also a prog liloconfig, but I havn't tried it and I don't know if its standard, sims from the opening lines that it sets up lilo to boot from hardisk) Here is a sample of my lilo.conf, you'll need to

Re: lilo question

1999-10-31 Thread Yedidya Bar-david
Hi Alon Kadury wrote: > > hi > i have a redhat 5.2 linux on my pc, along with win95 > when i installed my linux i didn't install lilo on the MBR but used to > option to boot from disk. > now i want to put lilo on the MBR (with windows as default) [snip] Lilo comes with a script called QuickIns

lilo question

1999-10-31 Thread Alon Kadury
hi i have a redhat 5.2 linux on my pc, along with win95 when i installed my linux i didn't install lilo on the MBR but used to option to boot from disk. now i want to put lilo on the MBR (with windows as default) i thought about a few ways: 1. edit the lilo.conf file. this is the file now: