On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:53:16PM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> #define D_(op,d,txt)\
>[ FOO_##op ] { \
>.opcode = FOO_##op, \
>.dir = d, \
>.name = #op, \
>.desc = txt \
>}
>
> static
On Monday 09 May 2005 15:33, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:13:11PM +0300, Leonid Podolny wrote:
>
> > This macro expands to another one (at include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h) ,
> > which, in turn, expands to yet another one. I'm yet to figure out the
> > whole mechanism, but this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> vomit inducing is a better word. Submit a patch to unroll these
> suckers, mayeb the maintainers would act sanely and take it (not
> counting on it though).
>
This macro acts as a sort of C++ template -- it unloops into ge
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:13:11PM +0300, Leonid Podolny wrote:
> This macro expands to another one (at include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h) ,
> which, in turn, expands to yet another one. I'm yet to figure out the
> whole mechanism, but this is really dirty. :)
vomit inducing is a better word. Submit a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonid Podolny wrote:
> As I see, I have here a function that has a prototype, is called four
> times, but has no implementation! :) However, it assembly code exists in
> svcauth_unix.o. Any ideas where did it come from? :)
I think we figured this one
