On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote about "Re: KDE 3.0 Instelation":
> 7.0 begat "7.0" respin and about 80meg of updates. 7.1 needed about the
> same. At last count my 7.2 system needed almost 150 meg of updates, not
> counting GCC 3, which I installe
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Dvir Volk wrote about "RE: KDE 3.0 Instelation":
> > i mean, the way i see it - kde is all about bringing ease of use to
> > Linux. and it does that, but just AFTER you install it.
> >
> > for, let's say, an advanced newbie, upgra
Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Newbies should not care about upgrading individual packages. They would
> just get the latest distribution (e.g., Redhat is released every 6 months)
> and install/upgrade it. Upgrading redhat is an almost trivial operation:
> you still the CD-ROM in, choose "upgrade", and it
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Dvir Volk wrote about "RE: KDE 3.0 Instelation":
> i mean, the way i see it - kde is all about bringing ease of use to
> Linux. and it does that, but just AFTER you install it.
>
> for, let's say, an advanced newbie, upgrading will be poss
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Dvir Volk wrote:
> > I liked the zillion packages. You see, sometimes I jsut want
> > one component,
> > not the entire warehouse.
>
> I didn't say that there shouldn't be seperate packages, of course that
> IS GOOD.
> but you i would also like to see a bundled package withal
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 18:43, Dvir Volk wrote:
> I didn't say that there shouldn't be seperate packages, of course that
> IS GOOD.
> but you i would also like to see a bundled package with all the
> necessary files and libs inside.
agreed. Linux is among others about choice.
> maybe there sh
> I liked the zillion packages. You see, sometimes I jsut want
> one component,
> not the entire warehouse.
I didn't say that there shouldn't be seperate packages, of course that
IS GOOD.
but you i would also like to see a bundled package with all the
necessary files and libs inside.
i mean,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Dvir Volk wrote about "RE: KDE 3.0 Instelation":
> which kinda makes you wonder: why isn't there just one big package for
> each distro, with all the needed dependecies (qt, libxml, openssh and
> such), and seperate packages for the "extra&qu
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 15:19, you wrote:
> which kinda makes you wonder: why isn't there just one big package for
> each distro, with all the needed dependecies (qt, libxml, openssh and
> such), and seperate packages for the "extra" stuff such as devel
> packages, koffice and maybe kdevelop?
>
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Dvir Volk wrote:
> which kinda makes you wonder: why isn't there just one big package for
> each distro, with all the needed dependecies (qt, libxml, openssh and
> such), and seperate packages for the "extra" stuff such as devel
> packages, koffice and maybe kdevelop?
>
> i m
> To: Tzafrir Cohen
> Cc: linux ILUG
> Subject: Re: KDE 3.0 Instelation
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> > Except ...
>
> Except nothing. Everything worked.
>
> > RPM's dependencies should have verified such silly stuff
> for
Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hetz Ben Hamo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ben-Nes Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "linux ILUG"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: KDE 3.0 Instelation
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Hetz
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Except ...
Except nothing. Everything worked.
> RPM's dependencies should have verified such silly stuff for you, right?
Sure, but I used --nodeps
--Ariel
--
Ariel Biener
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP(6.5.8) public key http://www.tau.ac.il/~ariel/p
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Ariel Biener wrote:
> I just did:
>
> cd /usr/local/src
> mkdir kde3
> cd kde3
> ftp ftp.sunet.se
> login as anonymous
> cd "/pub/kde/stable/latest/Red Hat/i386"
> bin
> prompt
> mget *.rpm
> quit
>
> then, rpm -Uvh --nodeps --force *.rpm
Just out of curiosity: what happens
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
I just did:
cd /usr/local/src
mkdir kde3
cd kde3
ftp ftp.sunet.se
login as anonymous
cd "/pub/kde/stable/latest/Red Hat/i386"
bin
prompt
mget *.rpm
quit
then, rpm -Uvh --nodeps --force *.rpm
After that, worked like a charm. Make sure you have openss
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> rpm -e `rpm -qa | grep kde` --nodeps
You left out the '^'
> rpm -Uvh *rpm --nodeps --force...
>
> worked perfect here ;)
'rm -rf /' will work fine next time you try it givenm you are root)
What if you have a package called 'hookdesktop' ? It will be
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Ben-Nes Michael wrote about "KDE 3.0 Instelation":
> > I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously
it
> > didn't work.
> > all the dependencies are ruined and now I need to guess what lib belong
to
> > wh
rpm -e `rpm -qa | grep kde` --nodeps
rpm -Uvh *rpm --nodeps --force...
worked perfect here ;)
Hetz
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 03:08 pm, Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
> Damn
>
> I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously it
> didn't work.
> all the dependencies are ruined an
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002, Ben-Nes Michael wrote about "KDE 3.0 Instelation":
> I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously it
> didn't work.
> all the dependencies are ruined and now I need to guess what lib belong to
> what package.
>
>
Damn
I fallowed KDE instruction of how to install the new KDE and obviously it
didn't work.
all the dependencies are ruined and now I need to guess what lib belong to
what package.
I think its shame that they put such instruction that don't work :(
Here is a snip ->
-
20 matches
Mail list logo
