2009/10/26 Gilad Ben-Yossef :
> Just an educated guess, but I believe Netvision might have an Akamai node
> hosted there while 012 may not. Since Youtube uses Akamai as a CDN, the
> connection via Netvision only foes through the local loop, while in other
> ISPs it does the long haul.
>
> Again,
Imri Zvik wrote:
On Monday 26 October 2009 14:24:11 geoffrey mendelson wrote:
Except for early morning, I can no longer watch YouTube videos. They
run for a few seconds, stop for a while and continue, then they stop
for a while and continue. If I switch to Netvision, they play smoothly.
On Monday 26 October 2009 14:24:11 geoffrey mendelson wrote:
> Except for early morning, I can no longer watch YouTube videos. They
> run for a few seconds, stop for a while and continue, then they stop
> for a while and continue. If I switch to Netvision, they play smoothly.
Wierd...
Could
On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Boaz Rymland wrote:
True regarding connection (and security is better with router,
AFAIK), but
not so regarding port 25 outbound comm. Some ISPs block it, as
mentioned
earlier in this thread. But, I think that a simple phone call to the
ISP's
tech service sh
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:45:25 +0200, geoffrey mendelson
wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Justin wrote:
>
>> I've been with Interal until now. But they are merging with Bezeq
>> Ben Liumi. I hate BBL, and more than that their quality sucks.
>>
>> Does anyone have a recommendation for a L
On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Imri Zvik wrote:
On Monday 26 October 2009 14:01:52 geoffrey mendelson wrote:
Actually I want traffic shaping. I want my VoIP to work. I want my
email. I'd like YouTube to work too, but 012 has not quite caught on
to that.
Could you please elaborate? I'm not awar
On Monday 26 October 2009 14:01:52 geoffrey mendelson wrote:
> Actually I want traffic shaping. I want my VoIP to work. I want my
> email. I'd like YouTube to work too, but 012 has not quite caught on
> to that.
Could you please elaborate? I'm not aware of any issues with YouTube, and I
would
On Oct 26, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
I hardly believe you'll find **ANY** ISP here in Israel which
doesn't do traffic shaping due to 2 simple reasons:
1. Bandwidth From/To Israel costs a fortune (thanks goes to Med-1),
add it with ..
2. Israel is considered a big big big pirac
On Oct 26, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Justin wrote:
I've been with Interal until now. But they are merging with Bezeq
Ben Liumi. I hate BBL, and more than that their quality sucks.
Does anyone have a recommendation for a Linux friendly ISP, that
doesn't block ports and can provide reasonable, l
I hardly believe you'll find **ANY** ISP here in Israel which doesn't do
traffic shaping due to 2 simple reasons:
1. Bandwidth From/To Israel costs a fortune (thanks goes to Med-1), add it
with ..
2. Israel is considered a big big big piracy heaven, which means whatever
bandwidth ISP throws to the
fine.
- low latency in general
- reasonably good VOIP performance
- at least 2.5MB asymmetric
- no QoS traffic shaping
- absolutely no port blocking
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Not enough info..
>
> Low latency connection to where? BBL maybe sucks
Not enough info..
Low latency connection to where? BBL maybe sucks in service, but they have
the biggest pipe in IIX for example (10 Gb) (I'm not trying to recommend
them, I'm not their customer)..
Some do not block ports, but do use QoS to shove the priority of P2P
(torrent, emule) way down...
I've been with Interal until now. But they are merging with Bezeq Ben
Liumi. I hate BBL, and more than that their quality sucks.
Does anyone have a recommendation for a Linux friendly ISP, that doesn't
block ports and can provide reasonable, low latency connections?
--
There must be a beginn
13 matches
Mail list logo
