their third version, and starting NT from 3.x didn't change that
> paradigm. I have the feeling that The Hurd will be fine WHEN and IF it
> is finally released as a stable OS, regardless of numbering.
>
> Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Dovix
× 21 × 2003, 18:37, ×× ××× Oded Arbel:
> BTW - as Debian GNU/Hurd have been mentioned here, here are the
> installation instruction if anybody wants to try it out.
> http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/hurd-install
Correction- don't use that manual. look for a debian
I was joking of course, about version numbers. That's why I added the [OT].
Funny, but it is a common knowledge that M$ apps become usable after their third
version, and starting NT from 3.x didn't change that paradigm. I have the feeling that
The Hurd will be fine WHEN and IF it
Another approach is for Hurd to implement interfaces, which will allow
it to use Linux drivers (this approach is almost as heretical as
developing a layer for allowing Linux to use NDIS-compatible drivers).
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Dovix wr
magic
> Number 3.0, Hurd can launch as Hurd 2005 ...
>
Maybe I did not express myself correctly, but I was only using the
numbering as an indication for stability and maturity. Hurd does not have
a stable release yet, and when it does it will be much less mature than
the current Linux (or eve
Meine children, has anyone of you played with Hurd?
--
---OFCNL
This is MY list. This list belongs to ME! I will flame anyone I want.
Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
To
