On 27/04/07, Danny Lieberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Amos
Separate paranoia from privacy.
While I am skeptical that Google can afford to make use of privacy
information or allow it to leak
- if I were working on a startup that threatens search engines - I might
also setup a private email syst
Danny Lieberman wrote:
> FWIW - it is standard operating procedure these days for a customer to
> insist you use their corporate email.
> I have a contract with a US corp. and they insist we use their
> corporate (hosted Exchange) email system
> It helps them monitor outgoing content for data leaka
Amos
Separate paranoia from privacy.
While I am skeptical that Google can afford to make use of privacy
information or allow it to leak
- if I were working on a startup that threatens search engines - I might
also setup a private email system somewhere.
FWIW - it is standard operating procedure t
On 26/04/07, Danny Lieberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gil
You must be kidding. Why in the world would you want a "local ISP"
Run (do not walk) to Google Applications at www.google.com/a
You have your own email, calendar and web site for free up to 50 users.
I am running two businesses
w
Gil
You must be kidding. Why in the world would you want a "local ISP"
Run (do not walk) to Google Applications at www.google.com/a
You have your own email, calendar and web site for free up to 50 users. I
am running two businesses
with it and I think it's outstanding.
The mail is the fa
On 4/22/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/22/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > True, however:
> > > 1. Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsu
On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/22/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > True, however:
> > 1. Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsung code in
it.
> > 2. Scalix has the least feature
>
> *le
On 4/22/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True, however:
> 1. Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsung code in it.
> 2. Scalix has the least feature
*least* features? I haven't got around to test it myself but thei
On 22/04/07, Gil Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
True, however:
1. Scalix is a free (as in beer), there is still HP/Samsung code in it.
2. Scalix has the least feature
*least* features? I haven't got around to test it myself but their web site
left me with the impression it aims (and ach
On 4/21/07, Marc A. Volovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoth Gil Freund:
> Sub 20 users licensing is expensive, and free/GPL version is not
> appropriate due to the outlook factor.
Scalix provides 25 outlook licenses in the community open edition...
True, however:
1. Scalix is a free (as in
Quoth Gil Freund:
> Sub 20 users licensing is expensive, and free/GPL version is not
> appropriate due to the outlook factor.
Scalix provides 25 outlook licenses in the community open edition...
--
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swiftouch, LTD
Hi,
Is there a local ISP providing groupware (Zimbra, Scalix or
OpenXchange) hosting. This is for a small site (5-8) users.
Sub 20 users licensing is expensive, and free/GPL version is not
appropriate due to the outlook factor.
Thanks
Gil
--
Gil Freund, Systems Analyst
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
