On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:36:02AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > * unicode based, os less fonts problems for the long run (once we all get
> > uniode fonts).
>
> Fonts without a Unicode (iso-10646-1) encoding also work, as long
> as they've got l
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:36:02AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> * unicode based, os less fonts problems for the long run (once we all get
> uniode fonts).
Fonts without a Unicode (iso-10646-1) encoding also work, as long
as they've got lots of encodings to offer (e.g. Monotype's
Arial, Courier N
Hi
I'm not too much up-to-date with the recent developments in gtk, and I
don't live by the CVS, and don't follow those lists. Still a search check
of the gnome lists archives yields the following, from:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-app-devel-list/2000-August/msg00481.html
The unstable v
