Hi Geoff,
> I expect that it was something quite different. Much more likely is that
> they either had money troubles, or they had staffing problems and wanted
> to hire someone who wanted the extra money.
>
> They figured you would take the cut, and if you did not, they would live
> with who
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 12:53:49AM +0300, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> I see your point, but I respectfully disagree. I can give myself as an
> example: After signing my last contract to work at a start-up, the
> "boss" decided (3 weeks after I started to work) that I need to select
> an option: either a
> Dear Hetz,
Hi Marc,
> > 2. As a person who previously "matched" between companies and
> > developers, I would say to any developer who wants to join you, that
> > you are a "Red Risk", which means that developers should ask for cash
> > (and not Shotef+30 or anything like that) or bank's c
- "Hetz Ben Hamo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2008/4/5 Uri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Dear linux-il friends,
>
> I somehow have a feeling that many people from here already marked a
> message from you as SPAM and kicked this message.
Dear Hetz,
I feel that your reaction to UeCh is
Hi,
2008/4/5 Uri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dear linux-il friends,
>
> 1. I'm very concerned with freedom of speech online, especially today
> when the www and Internet has become so commercial. When the big
> corporations control the Internet, or at least to some ex
Dear linux-il friends,
1. I'm very concerned with freedom of speech online, especially today
when the www and Internet has become so commercial. When the big
corporations control the Internet, or at least to some extent are
controlling the Internet, some things can't be said and some i
me :-) Maybe they're more afraid from nonviolent "terrorists" than
from violent ones. After all, I do admit to the most dangerous crime
of being a pacifist. It's contagious!
Uri, I think I want to express my gratitude to you for the first-class
entertainment you are providing on the list. Obs
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> You think it's unlikely, because you don't expect secret agents to
> read and/or block E-mail messages of ordinary people like me?
Now you're just ignoring what I said.
> What
> if, for example, there was someone (let's call him Osama) who is a
> very dangerous terrorist. D
>
> > What about a webmail like Gmail? I don't see how break into that, seeing
> > that login is done with SSL and that the servers lie in another country
> > and Google probably won't cooperate with the Israeli government.
>
> Think again. They cooperate with the Chinese government, and the
>
Quoting Uri Even-Chen, from the post of Sat, 09 Sep:
>
> OK, I checked and here is some more information: at the time I suspect
> they were blocking my E-mail (which I think they stopped now), I
> received many messages in delay of about 10 minutes, if they were sent
> to one of the addresses bein
Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Sat, 09 Sep:
> Even technically - if Gmail directly connects to the SMTP port on your
> private server - how is the government supposed to be able to intercept,
> analyse and then block your TCP stream "live"? It's not impossible but would
> require going to a
Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Mon, 11 Sep:
> On 11/09/06, Uri Even-Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think they are. I think they also sent agents to speak to me, spy
> >on me and pretend they are ordinary people. I think they listened to
> >my phone calls, and even disconnected some
Whoever who is not interested, please don't read this thread. And
please, don't respond! You're just spamming...
On 9/11/06, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think everything is a tradeoff. Say it costs $100 a day to do this sort
of surveilance on someone: let's say this (made up) cos
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 2:46 PM
To: Uri Even-Chen
Cc: linux-il
Subject: Re: Freedom of speech online
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Uri Even-Chen wrote about "Re: Freedom of speech
online":
> On 9/11/06, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Uri, the situation you&#x
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Uri Even-Chen wrote about "Re: Freedom of speech online":
> On 9/11/06, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Uri, the situation you're describing is possible technically, but highly
> >unlikely.
>
> You think it's
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 14:14 +0300, Imri Zvik wrote:
> I think we heard enough. As many people already mentioned before, this
> is a technical list, rather than a political one. If someone was tapping
> your emails, I'm sure you already managed to bore them off.
>
> Can someone please forward this
On 11/09/06, Uri Even-Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think they are. I think they also sent agents to speak to me, spy
on me and pretend they are ordinary people. I think they listened to
my phone calls, and even disconnected some of my phone calls. It's
difficult to prove, their agents nev
is this linux-il list?!
orim-so-important-and-everybody-wants-to-kill-me-il list?
Uri, take your paranoids elsewhere.
please.
/Nitzan
(an alleged war criminal)
On 9/11/06, Uri Even-Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/11/06, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Uri, the situa
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Uri Even-Chen
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 2:02 PM
To: Nadav Har'El
Cc: linux-il
Subject: Re: Freedom of speech online
On 9/11/06, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Uri, the situation you're describing
27;El; linux-il
Subject: Re: Freedom of speech online
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 01:12:53PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> About two years ago I failed to subscribe to unicode mailing lists on
> unicode.org, because their sysadmin decided that all emails from
> shemesh.biz should be blocke
On 9/11/06, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uri, the situation you're describing is possible technically, but highly
unlikely.
You think it's unlikely, because you don't expect secret agents to
read and/or block E-mail messages of ordinary people like me? What
if, for example, there wa
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 01:12:53PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> About two years ago I failed to subscribe to unicode mailing lists on
> unicode.org, because their sysadmin decided that all emails from
> shemesh.biz should be blocked (yes, spammers did use this domains some
> year and a half prio
Nadav Har'El wrote:
> I've seen even stranger things happening. Mails from yahoo.com silently
> dropped because some newbie sysadmin saw a lot of spam "from" @yahoo.com
> and decided to drop mail based on "from" address).
About two years ago I failed to subscribe to unicode mailing lists on
unicod
First of all, I agree with most of the answer and believe that what you
claim about governmental or any agency surveilance is possible but very,
very, very improbable.
El lun, 11-09-2006 a las 09:49 +0300, Nadav Har'El escribió:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006, Uri Even-Chen wrote about "Free
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006, Uri Even-Chen wrote about "Freedom of speech online":
> What I want you to know, is that recently I had some feeling that not
> all my E-mail messages are sent and received properly. Today I found
> out a proof that somebody is not only reading my mail, bu
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 05:39:11PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
>
>> And the bottom line is this. It's not about you, just like it wasn't
>> about me. As things stood, when MS did explicitly target Wine (in WGA)
>> they actually went public with it.
>>
>
> I'
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 05:39:11PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> And the bottom line is this. It's not about you, just like it wasn't
> about me. As things stood, when MS did explicitly target Wine (in WGA)
> they actually went public with it.
I've heard that Wine actually passed the WGA test w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nitzan wrote:
> I personally think what you're doing here is very bad, people who will
> read this discussion on google in the next zillion years would
> actually think Israel is a dark and scary place to live in.
>
> if i was you i would show some pe
On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 08:54 +0200, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Nitzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I personally think what you're doing here is very bad, people who will
> > read this discussion on google in the next zillion years would
> > actually think Israel is a dark and scary place to
But I don't want to get too much into politics here.
Please take your political views elsewhere.
This is a Linux oriented technical mailing list, not a forum on tapuz.
Me, for one, is is sick and tired of your bullshit.
Go away. Now.
On 9/8/06, marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe Uri mentioned sending from a given email address to two
addresses on the same mail server, with one email arriving and the other
"getting lost".
Barring the question of tin-foil hats, etc, it _is_ possible and, if you
ask my not very humble or
On 9/9/06, Nitzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I personally think what you're doing here is very bad, people who will
read this discussion on google in the next zillion years would
actually think Israel is a dark and scary place to live in.
Oh, sorry! I forgot! Israel is a free democracy, human
If I ever bothered to be serious in replying to such accusations, I'd be
more worried about Uri Even-Chen's own reputation than Israeli
reputation.
Every country has its own dark periods (Soviet Union's Stalin, USA's
McCarthy and Bush Jr. periods, etc. etc. even if I refrain from
mentioning the wo
I personally think what you're doing here is very bad, people who will
read this discussion on google in the next zillion years would
actually think Israel is a dark and scary place to live in.
if i was you i would show some personal responsibility and 1st check
my "facts" with security/network e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> When you hear hoofs, better first assume horses.
I believe Uri mentioned sending from a given email address to two
addresses on the same mail server, with one email arriving and the other
"getting lost".
Barring the question
On 08/09/06, Uri Even-Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, I have my own mail server and there is no spam filter. I'malso not black listed. I sent 2 messages from Gmail (same address),to 2 different addresses on my server, and only one of them wasreceived. I did it again, same result. I have
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> Thanks for the technical description. It sounds very similar to what
> I suspect they did. Did you know it was Netvision,
May I remind you, again, that I believe that what you think happened is
NOT what happened?
> or did you check
> the IP?
Your server is located at the N
On 9/8/06, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not that difficult if you recruit the ISP's cooperation (in his case -
netvision). Just redirect all traffic (or just the port 25 traffic) to a
filtering machine, and have it directly deliver anything that it does
not want to scan.
I'm not sa
On 9/8/06, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, here's how the "powers of the dark" work. There are two modus
operandi, and neither seem to match what you are doing here:
1. Gathering intelligence. In this mode, the worst thing that can happen
to them is that you know they are monitorin
On 9/8/06, marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe Uri mentioned sending from a given email address to two
addresses on the same mail server, with one email arriving and the other
"getting lost".
That's right.
Barring the question of tin-foil hats, etc, it _is_ possible and, if you
ask my n
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 19:13 +0300, Levy, Chen wrote:
> ביום שישי 08 ספטמבר 2006, 18:23, נכתב על ידי Omer Zak:
> > AND, YES, THE BORG INVASION IS PLANNED TO START ABOUT TWO YEARS FROM
> > NOW.
>
> Ah, so Vista got delayed again?
Yes. If Vista weren't delayed, then the Borg would have delayed thei
ביום שישי 08 ספטמבר 2006, 18:23, נכתב על ידי Omer Zak:
> AND, YES, THE BORG INVASION IS PLANNED TO START ABOUT TWO YEARS FROM
> NOW.
Ah, so Vista got delayed again?
ביום שישי, 8 בספטמבר 2006, 18:23, נכתב על ידי Omer Zak:
> AND, YES, THE BORG INVASION IS PLANNED TO START ABOUT TWO YEARS FROM
> NOW. START PREPARING NOW!
actually I can confirm that one, please "apt-get dist-upgrade -y" your
servers. resistance is not futile.
--
diego, kde-il translation team
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 17:46 +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Aviram Jenik wrote:
> > Common, being paranoid is fine, but you don't have to do it in a public
> > Linux
> > mailing list. People reading the archives might take you seriously.
> >
> Aw, come on. What's the fun in being paranoid insi
Aviram Jenik wrote:
> Not only is it very difficult to pull off technically,
Not that difficult if you recruit the ISP's cooperation (in his case -
netvision). Just redirect all traffic (or just the port 25 traffic) to a
filtering machine, and have it directly deliver anything that it does
not wan
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> OK, I want to clarify some things:
>
> 1. My mail server is configured correctly.
Don't you just love axioms.
> 2. After I wrote about it to a friend (from Gmail), they found out,
> and stopped the censorship within a few minutes.
Or the transient error got better.
> 4. I ha
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "linux-il"
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: Freedom of speech online
OK, I want to clarify some things:
1. My mail server is configured correctly.
2. After I wrote about it to a friend (from Gmail), they found out,
and stopped the c
On Friday 08 September 2006 15:27, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> I have reasons to believe the
> Israeli government is censoring me.
You've got to be kidding me.
Not only is it very difficult to pull off technically, it is ridiculous to
think that the barely functioning Israeli government (BTW: what m
OK, I want to clarify some things:
1. My mail server is configured correctly.
2. After I wrote about it to a friend (from Gmail), they found out,
and stopped the censorship within a few minutes.
3. I did again the same test, this time received both messages instantly.
4. I had the feeling that
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> Sorry, I have my own mail server and there is no spam filter. I'm
> also not black listed. I sent 2 messages from Gmail (same address),
> to 2 different addresses on my server, and only one of them was
> received. I did it again, same result. I have reasons to believe th
Sorry, I have my own mail server and there is no spam filter. I'm
also not black listed. I sent 2 messages from Gmail (same address),
to 2 different addresses on my server, and only one of them was
received. I did it again, same result. I have reasons to believe the
Israeli government is censo
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 02:06:32PM +0200, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Recently I was politically active and published opinions against the
> formal policy of the government of Israel. I don't want to get into
> details about my opinions, or if it's legal or not to express them.
> Wha
Hi everybody,
Recently I was politically active and published opinions against the
formal policy of the government of Israel. I don't want to get into
details about my opinions, or if it's legal or not to express them.
What I want you to know, is that recently I had some feeling that not
all my
53 matches
Mail list logo
