WGET is just webget. It's a small executable which
can fetch a file for you, given it's URL. However, it
can also recursively get a directory (or site).
There are many such programs for Win32, most of which
can recursively get an ftp directory, given it's URL,
even if they need to pass through an
Title: RE: FTP Proxy Recommendations
>But...after reading another message he has sent to
>the list, I can concloude that Squid is indeed enough
>for him. The fact that Netscape cannot leech (or suck)
>whole directories is really irrelevant - if one needs
>such functionality, o
SuSE developed a GPL ftp proxy/firewall. Check at www.suse.com or
www.suse.de. If you don't find it, write me and I'll mail the exact URL
(saw it today by accident ...)
Schlomo
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, [WINDOWS-1255] ôåôåá éáâðé wrote:
> I need some recommendations about right choice of FTP Applica
Right, my bad (although I'd call it
an HTTP gateway to FTP, not HTML).
In that case, I'd go with TIS FWTK.
Easy to configure, and in case you ever feel
the need it can be extended to support many
other protocols (i.e., ssh over plug-gw).
Tried and tested.
But...after reading another message he
> Here started a mini-discussion about SQUID, so I would like to point to the
> reasons I decided that SQUID is not enough: I can not (or maybe don't know
> how to) get entire directories using Netscape - No1, and can not configure
> MS FTP clients to work through SQUID - No2. So my decision was:
Title: RE: FTP Proxy Recommendations
Thanks for your attention to my problem.
Here started a mini-discussion about SQUID, so I would like to point to the reasons I decided that SQUID is not enough: I can not (or maybe don't know how to) get entire directories using Netscape - No1, an
Notice he says "(WS-FTP)". Squid provides an HTML gateway to FTP
while he needs a clean FTP gateway, when the firewall is an pseudo-FTP
server to which you login as "USER remoteusername@remotehost"
or maybe "USER remoteusername@remotehost firewall" username.
Then, the gateway would pass the clean
Squid can handle ftp proxying more than adequately.
Actually, it does that very well.
What, if anything, did you find to be lacking in Squid
for it to serve as an ftp proxy?
> ôåôåá éáâðé wrote:
>
> I need some recommendations about right choice of FTP Application Gateway
> for my corporate sub
Title: FTP Proxy Recommendations
I need some recommendations about right choice of FTP Application Gateway for my corporate subnet.
We have Squid as HTTP proxy running on 486 machine with RH52 serving MS clients for Internet access. Now I want to add a FTP support for Win95/NT machines (WS
