As usual, I'm joining the thread twenty days after it ended...
Quoth Doron Shikmoni on Tue, Aug 17, 1999:
> according to the precise word of the law, it is prohibited:
>
> 4. To say ABANIBI. (yes!).
Good. I always thought that there must be some law against such
songs. There is. Very good.
I wonder where is the Lists of the "Emzai Hofshi"
crisk wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
>
> > http://www.itpolicy.gov.il/zofen.htm says that the regulations are of
> > 1974. Am I missing something in Israeli history or this is long after
> > the mandate?
>
> I
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
> http://www.itpolicy.gov.il/zofen.htm says that the regulations are of
> 1974. Am I missing something in Israeli history or this is long after
> the mandate?
It's outdated. You can see the currently valid 1998 Itzik-Mordechay
amendment
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Doron Shikmoni wrote:
> 1. To teach cryptology in school or university;
> 2. To click on "secure shopping" in amazon.com;
> 3. To *tell* a potential client that you are making a product that
>can encrypt (even if last week you sold ten of them, with a license)
> 4. To say
Nadav,
Nadav Har'El wrote:
> I'm not a criminal, and I don't want any of my daily actions to be
> deemed illegal. I think that this is a basic right in a democracy.
You are making a very good point, and a sad one, too.
> P.S. the URL quoted by someone in a previous message seems to imply that
AA>> As I've heard, the law does exist only for the reason that is
AA>> was never cancelled. It's a mandatorical law (I wouldn't be
AA>> surprised if it's still in english), and nowadays it is not
AA>> enforced to any degree. I know that alot of respected systems in
http://www.itpolicy.gov.il/z
On Tue Aug 17 18:21:13 1999, Aviram Jenik wrote about "Re: Encryption law in Israel":
> That's totally untrue. This law is rather new (from the 70s I think), and
> it's very much enforced. Every company that produces software that uses
> encryption of some kind h
Nadav Har'El wrote:
> A system administrator told me today that he was required by Israeli
> law to use only the DES encryption option of ssh (the weakest ssh encryption,
> which is by default not compiled in because it's so weak), and that other
> encryptions supported by ssh (idea, 3des, etc.)
As i know the highest encryption allowed is the most simplest 40 bit Encryption.
Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> A system administrator told me today that he was required by Israeli
> law to use only the DES encryption option of ssh (the weakest ssh encryption,
> which is by default not compi
> On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> > Hi guys!
> >
> > A system administrator told me today that he was required by Israeli
> > law to use only the DES encryption option of ssh (the weakest ssh
encryption,
> > which is by default not compiled in because it's so weak), and that
other
>
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> A system administrator told me today that he was required by Israeli
> law to use only the DES encryption option of ssh (the weakest ssh encryption,
> which is by default not compiled in because it's so weak), and that other
> encryptions s
"Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A system administrator told me today that he was required by Israeli
> law to use only the DES encryption option of ssh (the weakest ssh encryption,
> which is by default not compiled in because it's so weak), and that other
> encryptions supported by
Hi guys!
A system administrator told me today that he was required by Israeli
law to use only the DES encryption option of ssh (the weakest ssh encryption,
which is by default not compiled in because it's so weak), and that other
encryptions supported by ssh (idea, 3des, etc.) are too powerful
an
13 matches
Mail list logo
