On 15/01/07, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually you just need to provide a set of packages for each host. That
nicely fits into data that is handled by gmake (space-separated lists)
and thus debian/rules can handle it well. You do need to automate the
generation of debian/control,
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 06:41:25AM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 16/01/07, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >aptitude seems to have all the relevant infrastructure in place. I have
> >no idea, though, how it tracks "installed" vs. "auto-installed"
> >packages. So with it you could a
On 16/01/07, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
aptitude seems to have all the relevant infrastructure in place. I have
no idea, though, how it tracks "installed" vs. "auto-installed"
packages. So with it you could actually use a per-host task package.
Yes, I'm aware of this and use it
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 09:09:26PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 15/01/07, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Your keyword here is preseed .
> >
> >>
> >> The software I'm thinking about will take all this configuration
> >information
> >> and build a host-specific package (or maybe
On 15/01/07, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your keyword here is preseed .
>
> The software I'm thinking about will take all this configuration
information
> and build a host-specific package (or maybe a "task" in debian world?)
which
> the host will just apt-get (either after a PXE b
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:17:00AM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 11/01/07, Oron Peled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >You also get all the other benefits without extra work:
> >- Repeatability + traceability of the install/update.
> >- rpmverify (who moved my cheese?)
> >- Package signing (not
On Thursday, 11 בJanuary 2007 00:17, Amos Shapira wrote:
> ... with a small twist that I'm more interested in Debian-based packages,
I'll point to Fedora tools, but I'm sure Debian has the equivalent to
most of them since it has the support infrastructure (apt) long before
Fedora existed (and had
On 11/01/07, Oron Peled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You also get all the other benefits without extra work:
- Repeatability + traceability of the install/update.
- rpmverify (who moved my cheese?)
- Package signing (not only for security, also to mitigate the
usual errors -- mixing test/produc
On Wednesday, 10 בJanuary 2007 11:37, Ishay wrote:
> I need a distribution mechanism for software which is running on redhat.
The best way is to use the OS practices. In this case:
- Package each component in its own RPM (or several RPMs).
- Use yum (or apt4rpm) to create repositories.
-
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:01:24PM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
> > I had the experience of having been forced to perform an emergency upgrade
> > of my PC's motherboard.
>
> Microsoft made a marketing decision to require a re-instalation of the
> ope
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 12:01:24PM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
> As it happens, Linux is very good at adapting itself for different
> hardware. It is not MS-Windows XP.
>
> I had the experience of having been forced to perform an emergency upgrade
> of my PC's motherboard. At the time I had both MS-W
--=-d2PGQHs32I5gu4sRw2zo
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 11:37 +0200, Ishay wrote:
> Hi all,
> I need a distribution mechanism for software which is running on redhat.
> The distribution audience will only include people in my compa
d fine).
2. Some individualized configuration files (such as IP address, host
name).
Linux will take care of all the rest.
--- Omer
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Ishay wrote:
> Hi all,
> I need a distribution mechanism forsoftware which is running on redhat.
&g
Hi all,
I need a distribution mechanism for software which is running on redhat.
The distribution audience will only include people in my company.
The installation of this software is very complicated (Apache
configuration, Perl module installation and other compilations).
Therefore, it is very
14 matches
Mail list logo
