On 2007-08-12 15:46, Ira Abramov wrote:
>> md5) and not filenames, I will be able to move images on the filesystems or
>> between machines without losing track of the metadata I recorded for them.
>
> unless you hide it in a file "fork" like on a mac or in NT, your only
> way of copying a file wit
Quoting Nadav Har'El, from the post of Sun, 12 Aug:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007, Ira Abramov wrote about "Re: Digital Photo Manager":
> > and a word for Nadav - all the metadata you ask for and more (tags
> > included) is supported within EXIF and IPTC data on JPEG and raw
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007, Ira Abramov wrote about "Re: Digital Photo Manager":
> and a word for Nadav - all the metadata you ask for and more (tags
> included) is supported within EXIF and IPTC data on JPEG and raw
You're right, but like I said, I don't want to modify th
Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Wed, 08 Aug:
>
> I now see that, unlike my previous camera circa 2003, the EOS 350D supports
> USB 2.0 (or at least it can connect to a USB 2.0 bus, many devices still run
> at 1.1 speed but I don't know about the EOS 350D).
> Still, connecting the camera to
Gallery is a very active project, meaning that security holes are quickly
closed, and all you have to do is just to apt-get update/yum update.
I wouldn't define neither Gallery v1 or v2 as a software with "serious
security holes" (unless you decide to install old versions). Moshe is
probably talki
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 20:43 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
> I don't turn the camera on to take the memory card out of it and put
> it back in, so battery time IS saved.
Ah, good point - I haven't noticed that. I don't have a dedicated SD
reader, but I noticed that when I use my palm as an SD reader
On 08/08/07, Moshe Leibovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Note though that there serious security holes in Gallery
> and is a constant target for attacks.
Is this still true for Gallery 2? From reading its docs I got the impression
one of its main goals was a complete re-design to avoid the se
On 08/08/07, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have no idea why you think so - on the contrary, minimizing the number
I now see that, unlike my previous camera circa 2003, the EOS 350D supports
USB 2.0 (or at least it can connect to a USB 2.0 bus, many devices still run
at 1.1 speed but
ing images - yes,
you can "edit" the image and write down tags manually, or - you can
create a tag in the tag tree, and then drag that tag to (one or more)
images or drag images to the tag.
5. I want a digital photo manager, not a digital camera
manager, and not a
o I really like Digikam's way of tagging images - yes,
you can "edit" the image and write down tags manually, or - you can
create a tag in the tag tree, and then drag that tag to (one or more)
images or drag images to the tag.
> 5. I want a digital photo manager, not a digit
type tags in, and then be
> unable
>to use them if I switch software. I don't loose my C code if I switch
> from
>VI to Emacs!
>
> 4. Bonus points for some automatically-generated "tags" based on dates,
>camera, colors, and other information obtainable
s folders are a worthless disaster. But remember
> 1b - these tags need to be saved in a simple format, not in a propriatary
> database. I don't want to spend hours to type tags in, and then be unable
> to use them if I switch software. I don't loose my C code if I switch from
> VI
em if I switch software. I don't loose my C code if I switch from
VI to Emacs!
4. Bonus points for some automatically-generated "tags" based on dates,
camera, colors, and other information obtainable from the picture files.
5. I want a digital photo manager, not a digita
13 matches
Mail list logo
