On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 18:59, Alon Barzilai wrote:
> whois search tells me your reconrd updated today.
> could it be that all the other dns still look for old server ?
I did update the zone file today, but that was only to add the $TTL line
(which wasn't there before, so named used the default --
Title: RE: DNS configuration problem
> server 212.150.48.169
Default Server: ns.barak.net.il
Address: 212.150.48.169
> set type=mx
> mangodsp.com
Server: ns.barak.net.il
Address: 212.150.48.169
Non-authoritative answer:
mangodsp.com MX preference = 0, mail exchanger = sm
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 18:29, Sagi Bashari wrote:
> 4 out of 5. Only netvisionn's DNS can't see it, so it's probably a
> problem with their DNS. Which other servers did you have problem with?
You are right. Besides the Netvision server I've tried only Fiasco's own
name server which also failed,
hi,
whois search tells me your reconrd updated today.
could it be that all the other dns still look for old server ?
Alon
Alex Shnitman wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to solve a problem we have with our DNS services. We have a
>primary DNS server here in the company, and Internet Zahav are
>secondar
On 10/8/2002 5:09 PM, Alex Shnitman wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to solve a problem we have with our DNS services. We have a
>primary DNS server here in the company, and Internet Zahav are
>secondaries for us. When I query either our server or one of the
>Internet Zahav servers about the MX record f
Hi,
I'm trying to solve a problem we have with our DNS services. We have a
primary DNS server here in the company, and Internet Zahav are
secondaries for us. When I query either our server or one of the
Internet Zahav servers about the MX record for our domain, they answer
fine. When I query othe
