192.168.0.0 worked for me.
It seems that the dhcp daemon allows configuration for the interface
itself,
if you define it as a subnet (I don't know why someone would want to use
it,
but buy I can argue with that)
Thank you Vadim.
Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Isaac Aaron on Thu, May 13, 1999:
> >
Quoth Isaac Aaron on Fri, May 14, 1999:
> 192.168.0.0 worked for me.
Good.
> It seems that the dhcp daemon allows configuration for the interface
> itself,
> if you define it as a subnet (I don't know why someone would want to use
> it,
> but buy I can argue with that)
I think that what you def
Quoth Isaac Aaron on Thu, May 13, 1999:
> Maybe one of you can help me.
I'm not exactly sure (the DHCP server I use has different
semantics), but I will still try.
> subnet 192.168.0.4 netmask 255.255.0.0
^^
Try changing this to 192.168.0.0. This should help.
> rang
Hi,
Maybe one of you can help me.
I have a funny error with dhcpd. I'm trying to configure it with a
simple dhcpd.conf:
subnet 192.168.0.4 netmask 255.255.0.0
{
range 192.168.0.10 192.168.0.254 ;
option domain-name "isaacshome.intranet";
}
where 192.168.0.4 is the ethernet car
