Thanks.
Reminds me how long it was since I last played with this stuff
(Motif on IRIX circa 1996-7).
guy keren wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
guy keren wrote:
that into account. assuming the GUI library is not thread-safe, you'll
need to make sure you perform all GUI o
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> guy keren wrote:
> > that into account. assuming the GUI library is not thread-safe, you'll
> > need to make sure you perform all GUI operations from within one thread
> > only - this requires some 'thread-to-thread' delegation mechanism - not
> > har
guy keren wrote:
that into account. assuming the GUI library is not thread-safe, you'll
need to make sure you perform all GUI operations from within one thread
only - this requires some 'thread-to-thread' delegation mechanism - not
hard to implement, but requires _some_ time.
Why is 'thread-to-thre
On Monday 01 September 2003 22:19, guy keren wrote:
> by the way, gilad - did you personally use fltk for a real
> (non-trivial) application? if so, can you comment on that?
> technically-wise, it looks like i should dump gtk+ in favor of fltk -
> if i find the widgets visually appealing ;) - but
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Aviram Jenik wrote:
> The application is very simple in terms of GUI, and heavy on internal logic -
> so the GUI is just a few buttons/edit boxes/progress bars, etc. Nothing too
> complicated.
> Cross platform is also not an issue: this GUI will be Linux only.
in that case, a
On Monday 01 September 2003 13:59, Voguemaster wrote:
> >
> > Java/Swing? Java/SWT? Not Free, but certainly free.
> >
Ok, to avoid expressing my thoughts on Java and specifically swing (despite
the fact I've been programming in it for almost 8 years now), I'll just say
the application will be wri
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:26:01 +0200, Alexander Maryanovsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 17:54 31.08.2003 +0300, Aviram Jenik wrote:
Hi,
We are currently debating on what GUI infrastructure to use for one of
our
products, and the main downside of qt seems to be its constraining
license.
Can any
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Aviram Jenik wrote:
> We are currently debating on what GUI infrastructure to use for one of our
> products, and the main downside of qt seems to be its constraining license.
> Can anyone shed more light on this subject? How much does the qt license cost
> to develop a non-GP
On Sunday 31 August 2003 17:54, Aviram Jenik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently debating on what GUI infrastructure to use for one
> of our products, and the main downside of qt seems to be its
> constraining license. Can anyone shed more light on this subject? How
> much does the qt license cost to
Hi,
We are currently debating on what GUI infrastructure to use for one of our
products, and the main downside of qt seems to be its constraining license.
Can anyone shed more light on this subject? How much does the qt license cost
to develop a non-GPL product that uses qt library?
Does it also
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Aviram Jenik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently debating on what GUI infrastructure to use for one of our
> products, and the main downside of qt seems to be its constraining license.
> Can anyone shed more light on this subject? How much does the qt license cost
> to develop a
At 17:54 31.08.2003 +0300, Aviram Jenik wrote:
Hi,
We are currently debating on what GUI infrastructure to use for one of our
products, and the main downside of qt seems to be its constraining license.
Can anyone shed more light on this subject? How much does the qt license cost
to develop a non-G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 31 August 2003 14:54, Aviram Jenik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently debating oEnterprisenfrastructure to use for one of our
> products, and the main downside of qt seems to be its constraining license.
> Can anyone shed more light on this su
13 matches
Mail list logo
