Daniel Feiglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See discussion on export keyword, p. 205 in The C++ Programming
> Language (3rd edn.), Stroustrup. It should do the job, but I don't
> know in GNU c++ implements it.
No. You get
warning: keyword 'export' not implemented and will be ignored
with gcc
See discussion on export keyword, p. 205 in The C++ Programming Language (3rd
edn.), Stroustrup. It should do the job, but I don't know in GNU c++ implements it.
mulix wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>
>
>>This may seem an ugly feature of C++, but in fact it is better than
Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This may seem an ugly feature of C++, but in fact it is better than
> the C counterpart - macros.
Inlined functions are supposed to be a standard C feature in C99. GCC
has had them for years.
> In fact, writing the implementation of inline functions
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> This may seem an ugly feature of C++, but in fact it is better than the C
> counterpart - macros. In fact, writing the implementation of inline functions
> in header file is a beautiful gem, comparing to writing the implemetation of
> calss templates i
>
>
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Shaul Karl wrote:
>
> > > you have put an inline function inside a '.cc' file. since it is inline,
> > > it will NOT be included in the object file 'base.cc', and thus, during
> > > link, there base constructor will be undefined. this is your bug - not
> > > g++'s.
>
2001, Shaul Karl wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 01:38:10 +0200
> > From: Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: C++: Problem with overloading a constructor when splitting a
> > src file.
> >
> > Pa
header file.
2. make the function not 'inline'.
guy
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 01:38:10 +0200
> From: Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: C++: Problem with overloading a constructor when splitting
Part 1: this works as expected
--
[01:27:40 tmp]$ cat main.cc
#include
#include
using namespace std;
class base
{
public:
base();
base(string &str);
};
class derived : public base
{
public:
derived(string &str) : base(str) {
