On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:01 +, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 02/11/2007, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am wondering what would be the best software to use as a
> bittorrent client for that purpose. Obviously, it has to be
> headless,
>
On 02/11/2007, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have an image I would like to push from a server. Due to the fact that
> it might have some demand, I would rather do it via bittorrent rather
> than http. I am wondering what would be the b
Hi all,
I have an image I would like to push from a server. Due to the fact that
it might have some demand, I would rather do it via bittorrent rather
than http. I am wondering what would be the best software to use as a
bittorrent client for that purpose. Obviously, it has to be headless,
and
ng the day and 280k during the night on a 256/5m)Best Regard,Ohad Levy- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: IGLU Mailing list <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Sun Oct 29 07:24:54 2006Subject: Re: offtopic: BitTorrent Traffic shaping tricks by Israeli ISP&#x
Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IGLU Mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sun Oct 29 07:24:54 2006
Subject: Re: offtopic: BitTorrent Traffic shaping tricks by Israeli ISP's?
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 02:34 +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 02:34 +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a small test with Azureus as a bittorrent clients.
> One machine is located in the US, one at home. Both have the same
> setup in terms of bandwidth: max 9Kbyte up, unlimited download.
>
> Torrent for
Quoting Hetz Ben Hamo, from the post of Sat, 28 Oct:
>
> I have tried the same test with 80 different torrent files, be it
> legal stuff and illegal stuff (movies, episodes etc), it's almost
> always the same result: the download is about 70-90% slower than the
> US machine.
try changing from the
same result: the download is about 70-90% slower than the
> > US machine.
> >
> > My ISP: Netvision.
> >
> > So, does anyone knows if Netvision and/or other ISP's are doing some
> > serious bandwidth tricks? if so, is there a way to bypass it (and
> &g
hine.
>
> My ISP: Netvision.
>
> So, does anyone knows if Netvision and/or other ISP's are doing some
> serious bandwidth tricks? if so, is there a way to bypass it (and
> still use bittorrent)?
All the major ISPs have dedicated services for file-sharing protocols,
which include tran
Hi,
I did a small test with Azureus as a bittorrent clients.
One machine is located in the US, one at home. Both have the same
setup in terms of bandwidth: max 9Kbyte up, unlimited download.
Torrent for this test: CentOS 4.4 final
The machine at US gets 400Kbytes per second (and the number
Quoting Ira Abramov, from the post of Sun, 21 May:
> > >The way I read it, supply far out weight demand on this torrent, and so
> > >your upstream is unneeded as there are probably better and closer seeds
> > >nearer to the downloading peers.
>
> actually I am downloading that file as well, and
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Sun, 21 May:
>
> >The way I read it, supply far out weight demand on this torrent, and so
> >your upstream is unneeded as there are probably better and closer seeds
> >nearer to the downloading peers.
actually I am downloading that file as well, and I'm
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 09:37:25AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> My session is currently at 96.8%. My stats show that I have downloaded
> 749.40MiB, that I know of 26 peers and 428 seeds (maybe this is where
> the symptoms come from?), and that, over all, over the past 8 and a half
> hours, a to
On Sun, May 21, 2006, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Nobody likes me! (or:
why does no body download FROM me on bittorrent?)":
> I know what the standard reply is going to be, and it's not it. I opened
> a PNAT rule in my firewall, and the bittorrent client is showing a g
Oded Arbel wrote:
>The way I read it, supply far out weight demand on this torrent, and so
>your upstream is unneeded as there are probably better and closer seeds
>nearer to the downloading peers.
>
>
First, that cannot be the case. How do I know? Because no one seems to
be reaching their ma
e standard reply is going to be, and it's not it. I opened
a PNAT rule in my firewall, and the bittorrent client is showing a green
light, meaning that other clients CAN connect to me. During the start of
the transfer some actually do, but as my transfer proceeds, so does the
lack of interest.
On Sunday 21 May 2006 09:37, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> downloaded 749.40MiB, that I know of 26 peers and 428 seeds (maybe
..
> It seems that despite the fact that
> there is more demand for this feed than supply, my supply is not
> demanded.
> If anyone has an explanation, I would love to hear it.
s not it. I opened
a PNAT rule in my firewall, and the bittorrent client is showing a green
light, meaning that other clients CAN connect to me. During the start of
the transfer some actually do, but as my transfer proceeds, so does the
lack of interest.
My logic says it should be the other w
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a bit torrent client that runs under linux and has an
> unusual option.
>
> If I am downloading a torrent that contains several parts, let's say
> a linux CD install set, I want the client to finish downloading each
> entire part first, befo
In Windows there's a Client called BitComet.
This client allows u to "ban" certain content, blocking it from being
downloaded. That way you can download just the files you want and it
works. Bittorrent OR bittornado should have a similar option. Haven't
checked it out though
On 22 Sep 2005 01:23:48 +, Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Geoff,
>
> I readily admit that I don't know much about how bittorrent works, so
> maybe I will say something stupid. Who cares - it will not be the
> first or the last time...
>
> A
Geoff,
I readily admit that I don't know much about how bittorrent works, so
maybe I will say something stupid. Who cares - it will not be the
first or the last time...
Assuming you use a client with a CLI, and to download a bunch of files
you do sth like
$ download $files
won't a
time. Then if
the seeds die or the tracker goes away on the 20th day, I have something
useable instead of 20 files of junk.
This probably would make bittorrent less robust, but it would make it
a lot more "loveable" to those who want it.
Obviously on the files that I can get at 100+ byte
Quoting Geoffrey S. Mendelson, from the post of Wed, 21 Sep:
> If I am downloading a torrent that contains several parts, let's say
> a linux CD install set, I want the client to finish downloading each
> entire part first, before starting the next.
it's not a bug, it's a feature. the torrent does
Hi,
I'm looking for a bit torrent client that runs under linux and has an
unusual option.
If I am downloading a torrent that contains several parts, let's say
a linux CD install set, I want the client to finish downloading each
entire part first, before starting the next.
For example, the torre
Hi all,
I've been using Lionetwork.net to download bittorrents but since 1 week
I can't no longer find bittorrents on their site. Anyone can tell me
what's going on with lionetwork.net ?
Do you have links to download bittorrents ?
thanks.
=
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erez Doron
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:04 AM
To: ilug
Subject: ot: bittorrent
hi
i am trying to download fc3 via bittorrent.
the problem: my fiirewall (which is not under my control) blocks port
6969, and i do not have an http proxy.
however, other ports are ope
Maybe you can try your ISP isp proxy.
Ohad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erez Doron
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:04 AM
To: ilug
Subject: ot: bittorrent
hi
i am trying to download fc3 via bittorrent.
the problem: my fiirewall (whi
hi
i am trying to download fc3 via bittorrent.
the problem: my fiirewall (which is not under my control) blocks port
6969, and i do not have an http proxy.
however, other ports are open for outgoing connectrion via nat (but not
6969).
the --minport switch does not influence the port used to
Though Bittorrent is considered safe, an md5sum is
also available:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/kinneret/Kinneret-0.7.2.md5sum
--- Dovix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo
try to make it available via BitTorrent.
We have planned for using BitTorrent for quite some
time, but the latest "slashtot effect" following the
article in Maariv made us realize we have to check
this promising technology not only for internal
distribution, but to test it at large scale.
Whait's involved?
my ip is not static.
Aaron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a static IP (actcom) on an ADSL line (96Kb upload). It's not much
but would it help if I downloaded Kinneret via Bittorrent and kept the
Bittorrent
up?
Would it help if others in this forum did thi
Hi,
I have a static IP (actcom) on an ADSL line (96Kb upload). It's not much
but would it help if I downloaded Kinneret via Bittorrent and kept the
Bittorrent
up?
Would it help if others in this forum did this?
--Amos
===
33 matches
Mail list logo
