Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-13 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
I think Tzafrir is asking whether your patch breaks compatibility with Open Office 1.0 file format, API, etc... Hetz On Monday 13 May 2002 00:14, Matitiahu Allouche wrote: > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > >Any comments on the binary compatibility of existing OpenOffice > >builds? > > I don't understand

Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-12 Thread Matitiahu Allouche
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >Any comments on the binary compatibility of existing OpenOffice >builds? I don't understand what you ask. We are talking about creating a new build. Shalom (Regards), Mati Bidi Architect Globalization Center Of Competency - Bidirectional Scripts

Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-12 Thread Matitiahu Allouche
Nadav Har'El wrote: >Is there a special reason why the binary version distributed by openoffice.org >cannot contain your patch, or even why the patch isn't integrated with the >official source (like was done in Mozilla)? Does your patch have the same >license as the regular openoffice.org code?

Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-12 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm willing to do it, but I will only have the HW to do it in a few days > (buying a new computer). Plus - I will be compiling on Debian, and I'm > not sure how adapt Debian is at compiling RPMs. If anyone else with > shorter ti

Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-12 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, May 12, 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D": > I'm willing to do it, but I will only have the HW to do it in a few days > (buying a new computer). Plus - I will be compiling on Debian, and I'm > no

Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-12 Thread Yotam Rubin
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 06:54:54PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sun, 12 May 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > > > I'm willing to do it, but I will only have the HW to do it in a few days > > (buying a new computer). Plus - I will be compiling on Debian, and I'm > > not sure how adapt Debian is a

Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-12 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > I'm willing to do it, but I will only have the HW to do it in a few days > (buying a new computer). Plus - I will be compiling on Debian, and I'm > not sure how adapt Debian is at compiling RPMs. If anyone else with > shorter timelines wants to volunt

Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-12 Thread Shachar Shemesh
I'm willing to do it, but I will only have the HW to do it in a few days (buying a new computer). Plus - I will be compiling on Debian, and I'm not sure how adapt Debian is at compiling RPMs. If anyone else with shorter timelines wants to volunteer, please do. Shachar Tzafrir Cohe

Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-12 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Just one note On Sun, 12 May 2002, Matitiahu Allouche wrote: > I am glad to announce that IBM Israel is ready to distribute updates to > the source for OpenOffice word processor (swriter), aimed at providing > Bidi (Hebrew and Arabic) support. Glad to see you managed to get at least that > > A

Re: Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-12 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, May 12, 2002, Matitiahu Allouche wrote about "Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D": > I am glad to announce that IBM Israel is ready to distribute updates to > the source for OpenOffice word processor (swriter), aimed at providing > Bidi (Hebrew

Bidi updates for OpenOffice word processor Rel 641D

2002-05-12 Thread Matitiahu Allouche
I am glad to announce that IBM Israel is ready to distribute updates to the source for OpenOffice word processor (swriter), aimed at providing Bidi (Hebrew and Arabic) support. According to the guidelines set by our legal department, we cannot release the full product, so we have built a set o