On Friday 06 July 2007 23:31, Oded Arbel wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 12:31 +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> > I got the router and installation was "almost" painless - there's no free
> > lunch ;-)
>
> What router did you get ?
I was going to get the Bezeq supplied Rotal for 2 reasons - price
and
On Friday 06 July 2007 18:31, Dani Arbel wrote:
> Shlomo,
> In your configuration, eth0 spans the whole 10.0.0.0/8 range, and eth0:1
> has a range inside... this is not something recommanded. I wonder that it
As I wrote, that was only a work-around to solve the static IP problem. Since
I went to D
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 12:31 +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> I got the router and installation was "almost" painless - there's no free
> lunch ;-)
What router did you get ?
> The one small problem I had was that I always had static IP addresses on my
> machines and after 3 or 4 attempts to set up
Shlomo,
In your configuration, eth0 spans the whole 10.0.0.0/8 range, and eth0:1
has a range inside... this is not something recommanded. I wonder that it
even works. I guess your problem with the static setup was network mask.
All you have to do is staticaly config the machines exactly how the
On Friday 06 July 2007 13:57, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> In your case it would be simpler to assign static IP's outside of the
> DHCP range. For example, if the router is set to assign IPs from
> 192.168.0.10 to 192.168.0.100 and the netmask on that interface
> is 255.255.255.0, then you can u
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:31:10PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> BUT - I was now left with problematical /etc/host files on all the machines.
> I
> could no longer ping shlomo1 or shoshana, etc, but only by the dynamic IP. I
> solved that by adding a second IP address as follows:
In your case
I got the router and installation was "almost" painless - there's no free
lunch ;-)
I'm back on-line with excellent speed - so I guess the problem was the old
Alcatel Home.
The one small problem I had was that I always had static IP addresses on my
machines and after 3 or 4 attempts to set up
't arrive
>> after waiting an hour.
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: *shlomo solomon* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>> Date: Jul 3, 2007 7:28 AM
>> Subject: ADSL connection problem
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:57:10PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> Basically, I assume you mean that instead of
> computers---firewall boxrouter as you suggested earlier, I'd do
> other computers --- hub --- my Linux box (with iptables) --- router
> - I'd be using only o
Hi Shlomo and everyone,
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:18:48PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> Thanks for all the detailed replies. I'm actually left with only one
> question,
> before I buy a router (as everyone has agreed).
>
> I understand that the Linksys WRT54G-L is Linux friendly, but aside fr
On Thursday 05 July 2007 22:40, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:18:48PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
<< snip >>
> > Since the whole purpose of the excercise ts to fix my connection problem,
> > I feel "safer" buying the Rotal router Bezeq provides. If there are any
> > p
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:18:48PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> I understand that the Linksys WRT54G-L is Linux friendly, but aside from the
> desire to support open source, why does that matter? You've all basically
> confirmed what the Bezeq technician said - the router is just plugged in and
Thanks for all the detailed replies. I'm actually left with only one question,
before I buy a router (as everyone has agreed).
I understand that the Linksys WRT54G-L is Linux friendly, but aside from the
desire to support open source, why does that matter? You've all basically
confirmed what th
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 19:17 +0300, Gadi Cohen wrote:
> 3) PPPoe on Linux is super easy.. As was suggested download all the
> packages while you still have internet (I don't recall off hand what
> you'll need but I'm sure there are some good HOW-TO's online - for
> starters download any packages ma
Ok I think Geoffrey answered most of your questions... so just a few
comments from my experience:
1) Bezeq saying everything is ok doesn't mean everything is ok. It
means the very obvious things are ok. Also in my experience (as someone
who is experienced and knows how to configure and diagnose
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 05:03:23PM +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> 1 - He said Bezeq would charge for replacing it. Although this is off-topic,
> I
> can't see why I have to pay to replace the modem which is Bezeq's property
> anyway. Would I also have to pay to replace a component in the Bezeq j
Firstly, thanks to all who answered (on and off the list) with suggestions.
Here's an update on my situation and a few new questions (at the end of this
post). This time the questions are not really technical and I'm really asking
for opinions. Please feel free to answer one or all of them.
Aft
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 20:00 +0300, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> Your suggestion about pinging with different sized packets showed me that I
> couldn't ping with more than 512 bytes. I set the mtu to 512 and can now send
> and receive e-mail, surf and even use ktorrent. But there are still problems:
>
On 7/3/07, Shlomo Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3 - There is obvoiusly still a problem here and I don't know if it's Bezeq or
015-Smile. I'm convinced the problem is not on my machine, since as I wrote
earlier, I have the same problem on my regular Mandriva partition and a
clean, non-update
On 7/3/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 03/07/07, shlomo solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this arrives twice, but my original message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't arrive after waiting an hour.
To the list managers - maybe an attachment to the end of messages is in
order
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 11:27, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:18:01AM +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > I contacted 015 and after being instructed to telnet into one of their
> > servers and succeeding (telnet 192.114.186.54 110) they said they had no
> > idea what
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 11:27 +0300, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:18:01AM +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
> [snip]
> > I contacted 015 and after being instructed to telnet into one of their
> > servers and succeeding (telnet 192.114.186.54 110) they said they had no
> > idea wh
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:18:01AM +0200, shlomo solomon wrote:
[snip]
> I contacted 015 and after being instructed to telnet into one of their
> servers and succeeding (telnet 192.114.186.54 110) they said they had no
> idea what to do (we don't support Linux). The only thing they suggested was
>
On 03/07/07, shlomo solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry if this arrives twice, but my original message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't arrive after waiting an hour.
Don't know about your problem but the linux.org.il alias was shut down a few
weeks ago and only mail to cs.huji.ac.il is accept
f their network, but its just my thoughts.
shlomo solomon wrote:
> Sorry if this arrives twice, but my original message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> didn't arrive
> after waiting an hour.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: *shlomo
Sorry if this arrives twice, but my original message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't arrive after waiting an hour.
-- Forwarded message --
From: shlomo solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 3, 2007 7:28 AM
Subject: ADSL connection problem
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAI
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Omer Zak wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have a problem connecting to the ADSL service from Linux. I have
> > tried everything I know and I simply can't get it to work. Maybe some
> > of the ADSL experts here will have an idea...
>
> [... snipped ...]
>
> Lior,
> Your detailed repo
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Lior David wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a problem connecting to the ADSL service from Linux. I have
> tried everything I know and I simply can't get it to work. Maybe some
> of the ADSL experts here will have an idea...
[... snipped ...]
Lior,
Your detailed report on your ADSL
Hello,
I have a problem connecting to the ADSL
service from Linux. I have tried everything I know and I simply can't get it to
work. Maybe some of the ADSL experts here will have an idea...
First, before the big problem, I
followed the ADSL howto exactly (I hope) but when I tried to connect I
Hi!
Last info says that the authentication method in Bezeq system was changed
from PAP to CHAP
so copy your chap secrets file to papa secrets.
Hope this will do the trick.
Dani
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Tlailax wrote:
> hi
> i'v just recently got connected to the adsl experiment.
> recieved an ORCKIT
hi
i'v just recently got connected to the adsl experiment.
recieved an ORCKIT adsl modem and a CNET NIC.
everything works fine under win98, but when trying to connect under
linux (Mandrake 7.1, following the ADSL-HOWTO-BEZEQ )
it apperantly starts connecting and then dies with either "pppd : LCP
31 matches
Mail list logo
