On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Omer wrote:
> Why should one think about:
> * Embedding Tcl
> * Embedding Perl
> * Embedding ELisp
> or something else, when there is guile?
Simple: why I have a lot of faith in guile, it is pretty much vapourware
at this stage. Yes, there is code to play with, but it isn't
Dear Stanislav,
Recently you had posted a reply to my message to this list. In this reply
you complained about unusability of LISP as a scripting language. However,
you had missed the point.
guile is embeddable subsystem, which uses scheme variant as a reference
language. Real power of guile c
O>> or something else, when there is guile?
O>>
O>> It is designed from ground up to be as embeddable as beer, and no-one
O>> requires you (although I would like to have such a law passed a
O>> parliament) to use scheme syntax. It is the Right thing to use.
Maybe there's still renegades which a
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Omer wrote:
> Sorry people, what is happening here?
[... snipped ...]
> ... This is true because such an approach allows
> core develpers to focus on performance and stability, while branch
> developers may focus on features.
[... snipped ...]
> The whole previous message i
Sorry people, what is happening here?
Why should one think about:
* Embedding Tcl
* Embedding Perl
* Embedding ELisp
or something else, when there is guile?
It is designed from ground up to be as embeddable as beer, and no-one
requires you (although I would like to have such a law passed a
pa
