Re: [solved] Re: A Conundrum: weird load average

2005-11-09 Thread Oded Arbel
On Tuesday, 8 בNovember 2005 23:43, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:50:38PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote: > > I still don't understand why the Java process wasn't showing on the > > ps/top list - it didn't even have a lot of 'total cpu time' > > allocated to it. > > Maybe you are

Re: [solved] Re: A Conundrum: weird load average

2005-11-08 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:50:38PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote: > I still don't understand why the Java process wasn't showing on the > ps/top list - it didn't even have a lot of 'total cpu time' > allocated to it. Maybe you are running a kernel before 2.6.10? See http://procps.sourceforge.net/faq.ht

[solved] Re: A Conundrum: weird load average

2005-11-08 Thread Oded Arbel
On Tuesday, 8 בNovember 2005 13:06, Oded Arbel wrote: > On Sunday, 6 ׳‘November 2005 22:13, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote: > > Maybe one of the scripts/daemons has a loop of quite short delays? > > Testing this isn't very easy - you can either strace some of the > > suspects or try something like syscal

Re: A Conundrum: weird load average

2005-11-08 Thread Oded Arbel
On Tuesday, 8 בNovember 2005 13:51, Amos Shapira wrote: > On 11/8/05, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Java program was supposed to do was call wait() (a Java thread > > synchronization call) every second, which was indeed verified by > > stracing the Java process, and here is the output:

Re: A Conundrum: weird load average

2005-11-08 Thread Amos Shapira
On 11/8/05, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Java program was supposed to do was call wait() (a Java thread > synchronization call) every second, which was indeed verified by > stracing the Java process, and here is the output: > > futex(0x4d907b60, FUTEX_WAIT, 233, {0, 265545000}) = -1 ETIM

Re: A Conundrum: weird load average

2005-11-08 Thread Oded Arbel
On Sunday, 6 בNovember 2005 22:13, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:05:39PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote: > > Hi list. > > > > I have a problem with a P4 (hyper-threaded) powered server. It > > constantly has a load average of 2.something, while looking with > > top I don't see any

Re: A Conundrum: weird load average

2005-11-07 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:05:39PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote: > Another weird thing is that a quick calculation would have the VIRT > usage of the system very close to the total memory available (1GB > physical + 1GB swap), yet the top output above shows more then half > of memory to be available(!)

Re: A Conundrum: weird load average

2005-11-06 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:05:39PM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote: > > Hi list. > > I have a problem with a P4 (hyper-threaded) powered server. It > constantly has a load average of 2.something, while looking with top I > don't see any process actually taking all that CPU resource. I don't have a ver

A Conundrum: weird load average

2005-11-06 Thread Oded Arbel
Hi list. I have a problem with a P4 (hyper-threaded) powered server. It constantly has a load average of 2.something, while looking with top I don't see any process actually taking all that CPU resource. Here's a snippet of /proc/cpuinfo: vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 mod