On Sun, Oct 08, 2000, Matan Ziv-Av wrote about "[meta] Reply-To header":
>
> In the short time since the list adds a reply-to header, we have
> seen a few double messages as a result, and a reply that was sent to the
> list by mistake. Is it not enough to prove t
In the short time since the list adds a reply-to header, we have
seen a few double messages as a result, and a reply that was sent to the
list by mistake. Is it not enough to prove that a return to normal
behaviour is necessary?
--
Matan Ziv-Av. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
