Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-11 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Amos Shapira wrote: > > Finally, I heard from people who worked at CheckPoint (Shachar? not > sure, I knew a few) I joined CheckPoint when they had just started talking about migrating to ClearCase (from CVS). I left CheckPoint (two years and three months later) at about the point where ClearCase s

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-11 Thread Jonathan Ben Avraham
ROTECTED]>, linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il Subject: Re: [OT] SVN commercial support On 10/11/07, Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is no built-in development framework in SVN like there is in ClearCase UCM. Agreed, but you've also mentioned that developers rarely take the time to

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-11 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi! On Thursday 11 October 2007, Amos Shapira wrote: > On 10/10/2007, Leonid Podolny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > My employer considers switching CM (i.e. "source control") system. The > > current favorite in the race is ClearCase. Previously, at my previous > > place of work, we worked

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-11 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On 10/11/07, Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is no built-in development framework in SVN like there is in > ClearCase UCM. Agreed, but you've also mentioned that developers rarely take the time to understand ClearCase. In the army, we also tried to implement UCM (the 'mu

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-11 Thread Amos Shapira
On 11/10/2007, Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Amos, > There is no built-in development framework in SVN like there is in > ClearCase UCM. With SVN you can role your own development framework using > the hooks, but that's very different from having one ready-made for you. > I

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-11 Thread Amos Shapira
On 11/10/2007, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/10/2007, Leonid Podolny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > My employer considers switching CM (i.e. "source control") system. The > > current favorite in the race is ClearCase. Previously, at my previous > > place of work, we

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-10 Thread Leonid Podolny
Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote: > > If you do not have at least 30 developers then the admin overhead that > ClearCase requires will be very expensive for you in relation to the > advantages that it offers. > Regards, > We have 5 times this amount. So, from reading at this list I begin to think that

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-10 Thread Jonathan Ben Avraham
24:12 + From: Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il Subject: Re: [OT] SVN commercial support On 11/10/2007, Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: developers working in one location. Once you go above that number there begin to be project manageme

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-10 Thread Amos Shapira
On 11/10/2007, Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > developers working in one location. Once you go above that number there > begin to be project management issues such as the need to lock down > branches, define releases and other build types, and impose development > discipline. Th

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-10 Thread Jonathan Ben Avraham
ation to the advantages that it offers. Regards, - yba On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Leonid Podolny wrote: Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:22:38 +0200 From: Leonid Podolny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il Subject: [OT] SVN commercial support Hi, My employer considers switching CM (i

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-10 Thread Amos Shapira
On 10/10/2007, Leonid Podolny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > My employer considers switching CM (i.e. "source control") system. The > current favorite in the race is ClearCase. Previously, at my previous > place of work, we worked with Subversion, and it was simply amazing -- .. > Any sugge

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-10 Thread Kfir Lavi
> > > Technically, this is not true. ClearCase is more sophisticated. In > addition to barebones SCM, it offers a development workflow (called "UCM") > integrating with their issue-tracking (ClearQuest), dynamic views, IDE > integration and some more features -- but this comes at a price of very b

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-10 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Wednesday 10 October 2007, Leonid Podolny wrote: > Hi, > My employer considers switching CM (i.e. "source control") system. The > current favorite in the race is ClearCase. Previously, at my previous > place of work, we worked with Subversion, and it was simply amazing -- > light, simple, yet po

Re: [OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-10 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On 10/10/07, Leonid Podolny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Previously, at my previous > place of work, we worked with Subversion, and it was simply amazing -- > light, simple, yet powerful. (And infinitely cheaper, of course.) I agree. I haven't worked with next-gen SCMs (git etc.) but Subversion

[OT] SVN commercial support

2007-10-10 Thread Leonid Podolny
Hi, My employer considers switching CM (i.e. "source control") system. The current favorite in the race is ClearCase. Previously, at my previous place of work, we worked with Subversion, and it was simply amazing -- light, simple, yet powerful. (And infinitely cheaper, of course.) The basic reasoni