On Thursday 14 August 2003 15:15, Aviram Jenik wrote:
> > in C I would put the new .obj (compiled code) instead of the old one, and
> > try to link...
>
> Again, unless I'm not following you, you cannot do that in C++ either. If
> the interface *changed*, and other classes are using that interface
not so in Java. if a class exposes a certain interface which other classes
use, newer versions can add methods or remove unused methods w/o a need to
recompile the using classes.
Even more "breaking" changes are allowed, see
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/binaryComp.doc.ht
On Thursday 14 August 2003 12:42, Tal Achituv wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Would Tal clear this up, please? I'm intrigued.
I've been following this thread too, and I'm pretty confused. But based on:
>
> To Clear things up, the interface definitely changed... there's no question
> there...
The utility yo
OTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tal Achituv
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 6:05 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Java linkage
>
>
> I'm looking for a solution for internal affairs :-) not with clients...
>
> we do that class
Uzi Refaeli wrote on 2003-08-13:
> Donot know about such a tool but you can check that:
> * The new class dose not import classes that are not in the application cp.
> * The class signature is the same.
>
`javap` is useful to recover class signatures from compiled .class
files (in case that's your
Hi all
Is there a tool / method to check if a compiles java object (class) links
correctly?
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Tal Achituv.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g.,
#x27;
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Java linkage
>
>
> Yes, When I wrote the mail I was confused myself - as there is no real
> "link" in java...
>
> here's the problem:
>
> I have to supply a patch for a software build
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [OT] Java linkage
Yes, When I wrote the mail I was confused myself - as there is no real
"link" in java...
here's the problem:
I have to supply a patch for a software build 18, and am
currently working
on build 22 of the same software.
I wonder
>Hi,
>
>Would Tal clear this up, please? I'm intrigued.
>
>I feel like everyone else understood that you want to know if you changed
>the interface of your own class while I read your question that you want to
>know if the new version of the class depends on new external code.
>Who's right?
>
>Than
uot;links" with all
the others correctly... [lets say a method signature changed])...
Do you know if there is a "solution" in the industry??
Tal.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Gidron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 6:04 PM
To: 'Tal Achit
quot; issue?
Thanks,
Tal.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Gidron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 6:51 PM
To: 'Tal Achituv'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] Java linkage
Well,
I hope you guys don't use an obfuscator :-)
What I would do is f
> To: Uzi Refaeli
> Subject: Re: [OT] Java linkage
>
>
> import caluses are meaningless here. They are just a
> syntactic sugar to
> let programmers avoid having to type the full package names
> every time they
> reffer to a class.
> The class signature also ha
TECTED]'
Subject: RE: [OT] Java linkage
Yes, When I wrote the mail I was confused myself - as there is no real
"link" in java...
here's the problem:
I have to supply a patch for a software build 18, and am currently working
on build 22 of the same software.
I wonder if I can j
This is indeed a viable and good solution. What strikes me odd is that
you have the sources, you KNOW the changes made (obviously you also
document them :). You should at least have an idea about your class
interfaces. Following good OO design for your class interfaces usually
means almost no probl
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 19:04, Tal Achituv wrote:
> I'm looking for a solution for internal affairs :-) not with clients...
>
> we do that class changing thing allot here, and looking for a way to
> resolve this "dependency" issue.. I have the sources.. no need to
> decompile...
> here's the
e-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tal Achituv
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 6:05 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [OT] Java linkage
I'm looking for a solution for internal affairs :-) not with clients...
we do that class changing thing allot
16 matches
Mail list logo
