Re: [OFFTOPIC] Time varying FSMs

2015-01-30 Thread Omer Zak
Of course, anything more complicated than a non-programmable calculator can be considered to be a Turing machine (sometimes, with bounded memory capacity). However, it would be as useful as saying that every computer program is a function transforming an input (such as a series of events in a GUI

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Time varying FSMs

2015-01-30 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Shachar Shemesh writes: > On 29/01/15 15:37, Ori Idan wrote: > > Didn't you just describe a Turing machine? > > Turing machine is finite and has certain number of states with > defined transitions. I think what Omer meant here was more of a > dynamic Turing ma

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Time varying FSMs

2015-01-30 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Oleg Goldshmidt writes: > I don't think so. No one said anything about having an infinite number > of states, for instance. s/numer of states/memory/ of course. I did get it right closer to the end of my post. Sorry for the slip. -- Oleg Goldshmidt | p...@goldshmidt.org

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Time varying FSMs

2015-01-29 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Shachar Shemesh writes: > Didn't you just describe a Turing machine? I don't think so. No one said anything about having an infinite number of states, for instance. There may or may not be a connection, so what? A Turing machine is a theoretical construct, I thought the question was about practi

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Time varying FSMs

2015-01-29 Thread Shachar Shemesh
On 29/01/15 15:37, Ori Idan wrote: > > Didn't you just describe a Turing machine? > > Turing machine is finite and has certain number of states with defined > transitions. I think what Omer meant here was more of a dynamic Turing > machine. > Since a Turing machine has an infinite amount of mem

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Time varying FSMs

2015-01-29 Thread Ori Idan
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > On 28/01/15 20:04, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > > Omer Zak writes: > > > After a brief Google search: > Does anyone know about any research, theory or practice of time-varying > finite state machines? > > Short answer: I don't. ;-) I'll

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Time varying FSMs

2015-01-29 Thread Shachar Shemesh
On 28/01/15 20:04, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > Omer Zak writes: > >> After a brief Google search: >> Does anyone know about any research, theory or practice of time-varying >> finite state machines? > Short answer: I don't. ;-) I'll offer a couple of thoughts, anyway. > >> I mean FSMs which might gro

Re: [OFFTOPIC] Time varying FSMs

2015-01-28 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Omer Zak writes: > After a brief Google search: > Does anyone know about any research, theory or practice of time-varying > finite state machines? Short answer: I don't. ;-) I'll offer a couple of thoughts, anyway. > I mean FSMs which might grow a new state, remove a state, add/subtract > trans

[OFFTOPIC] Time varying FSMs

2015-01-27 Thread Omer Zak
After a brief Google search: Does anyone know about any research, theory or practice of time-varying finite state machines? I mean FSMs which might grow a new state, remove a state, add/subtract transitions by means of meta-rules. Given the research demonstrating the plasticity of the brain, such