Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 01:16:03PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004, Matan Ziv-Av wrote about "[META] list aliases":
The list has (at least) three aliases [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems that the only
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about "Re: [META] list aliases":
> And another thing: take a look at the three separate partial archives of
> this list in mail-archives.
There is no reason for partial archives: I subscribe to only one mailing
list, and I get all the ma
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 01:16:03PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004, Matan Ziv-Av wrote about "[META] list aliases":
> > The list has (at least) three aliases [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems that the only
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004, Matan Ziv-Av wrote about "[META] list aliases":
> The list has (at least) three aliases [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems that the only
> use for those is to make people who don't check the To and Cc headers
The list has (at least) three aliases [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] It seems that the only
use for those is to make people who don't check the To and Cc headers
before they send post double messages to the list (see the current
[JOB... thread).
Can the people in
