Re: /dev in with 2.6 has been rearranged

2004-05-14 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 10:09:36PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > This doesn't work with devfs. If the sound module isn't loaded, there is > no /dev/dsp. There is no /dev/audio/whatever either. The kernel is not > yet aware that there is a sound card in the machine. As far as I > understood, th

Re: /dev in with 2.6 has been rearranged

2004-05-09 Thread Diego Iastrubni
בSunday 09 May 2004 7:36 pm, נכתב על ידי Muli Ben-Yehuda: > More details about udev are available here: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/udev-FAQ. This is > required reading material if you think that devfs should not be > deprectated and is in fact the greatest thing since sl

Re: /dev in with 2.6 has been rearranged

2004-05-09 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Sun, 09 May: > You probably set "mount devfs on boot" when compiling the kernel. This > is not a recommended option, as far as I recall. it's OK but if you don't apt-get install devfsd you will go nuts trying to find your old devices. anoter option is NOT

Re: /dev in with 2.6 has been rearranged

2004-05-09 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 10:09:36PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Muli said something about a replacement, but you will have to ask him > about that. In 2.6, devfs is deprecated, and the recommended replacement is udev. udev + hotplug + sysfs does basically everything devfs did, while keeping i

Re: /dev in with 2.6 has been rearranged

2004-05-09 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Oded Arbel wrote: Basicly devfsd gets rid of the mess that /dev is and simply does not show you nodes for hardware you don't have (no more 200 /dev/ttyS* nodes when you only have one serial ports) and does away with the single huge list that makes it hard to find what you want. The problem is n

Re: /dev in with 2.6 has been rearranged

2004-05-09 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
alex rait wrote: > I was trying to compile my 2.6.5 kernel in debian, when after some actions > I can't recall now, the /dev directory underwent some modifications: > Somehow there appeared subfolders, and the dev files could be found only > it's category. For instance in the folder /dev/partiti

Re: /dev in with 2.6 has been rearranged

2004-05-09 Thread Shachar Shemesh
alex rait wrote: I was trying to compile my 2.6.5 kernel in debian, when after some actions I can't recall now, the /dev directory underwent some modifications: Somehow there appeared subfolders, and the dev files could be found only it's category. For instance in the folder /dev/partitions I've fo

Re: /dev in with 2.6 has been rearranged

2004-05-09 Thread Oded Arbel
×Sunday 09 May 2004 21:12, ×× ××× alex rait: > I was trying to compile my 2.6.5 kernel in debian, when after some actions > I can't recall now, the /dev directory underwent some modifications: > Somehow there appeared subfolders, and the dev files could be found only > it's category. For insta

/dev in with 2.6 has been rearranged

2004-05-09 Thread alex rait
I was trying to compile my 2.6.5 kernel in debian, when after some actions I can't recall now, the /dev directory underwent some modifications: Somehow there appeared subfolders, and the dev files could be found only it's category. For instance in the folder /dev/partitions I've found my harddriv