On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Alon Altman wrote:
> > Can anyone remind me why Linux-IL was set up to receive messages from
> > non-subscribers (subject to human moderator's approval) in the first
> > place?
> >
> > If there is no good reason, how about reconfiguring the list to reject all
> > messages fro
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 17:43, Omer Zak wrote:
> Can anyone remind me why Linux-IL was set up to receive messages from
> non-subscribers (subject to human moderator's approval) in the first
> place?
Because some desired messages do come from non-subscribers, such as
event notifications or job offer
> Can anyone remind me why Linux-IL was set up to receive messages from
> non-subscribers (subject to human moderator's approval) in the first
> place?
>
> If there is no good reason, how about reconfiguring the list to reject all
> messages from non-subscribers? Then Alex Shnitman will not have t
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Alex Shnitman, from the post of Tue, 11 Feb:
> >
> > If it's desired, and enough people are willing to take on the job, I
> > guess we can set this list up as a moderated list, but I don't think
> > that everybody will agree to do this.
>
> did I
> > Not to defend the practice of asking a question without being on the
> > list, but what about the bigger goal of helping a linux win?
>
> I see that as a moot issue. Linux has already won. what I
Ever heard of "be paranoid"?
I wouldn't say that "Linux has won" any time soon, there is a lot
Quoting Alex Shnitman, from the post of Tue, 11 Feb:
>
> If it's desired, and enough people are willing to take on the job, I
> guess we can set this list up as a moderated list, but I don't think
> that everybody will agree to do this.
did I say we should moderate EVERY post? I just think that o
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:09, Ira Abramov wrote:
> > This is because Eyal won't find the time to follow the Linux-IL mailing
> > list and help other Linux-IL subscribers with their problems, in exchange
> > for the help which he is asking for now.
>
> well, you can also mention the fact that the p
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I don't mind questions from offlist people, but questions about
> > proprietery products with no intereset for the Free Software community
> > (nor even, sigh, for OpenSource people), should be filtered out.
>
> Not to defend the practice of asking
Omer Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Eyal Shani wrote:
>
> > Thanks in advance, and please reply to me direct too as im not in the list.
>
> ^^^^
>
> I urge anyone who spends his valuable time replyin
> I don't mind questions from offlist people, but questions about
> proprietery products with no intereset for the Free Software community
> (nor even, sigh, for OpenSource people), should be filtered out.
Not to defend the practice of asking a question without being
on the list, but what about t
Quoting Omer Zak, from the post of Tue, 11 Feb:
> > Thanks in advance, and please reply to me direct too as im not in the list.
>
> ^^^^
>
> I urge anyone who spends his valuable time replying to Eyal (an Oracle
> employee, i
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Eyal Shani wrote:
> Thanks in advance, and please reply to me direct too as im not in the list.
^^^^
I urge anyone who spends his valuable time replying to Eyal (an Oracle
employee, if to judge from his
12 matches
Mail list logo
