On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Pavel Bibergal wrote:
>
> question: is translating program to hebrew considered for amuta service?
>
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE follow up this email on [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
list only and not on Linux-il. thanks.
<>
Pavel, I'm amazed. How can you be _this_ bloody stupid,
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Quoth Moshe Zadka on Sat, Apr 15, 2000:
> > 2. Type "python -c 'from SimpleHTTPServer import*;test()'"
>
> Not everything should run on Python, you know.
>
I would have changed the order of the words in that sentence.
-- Ors.
=
Dunno about KDE, but try http://www.sunfreeware.com
-- Ors
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arrrgh. YABI(Yet another Bloody Idiot).
This is not a joke list. Read the FAQ, and keep your worthless ramblings
off the list.
-- Ors.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message b
I'd start with upgrading the kernel ...
-- Ors
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Zohar Friling wrote:
> Hi all.
> Need some help solving memory leaking problem.
> I am running Redhat 2.2.5-15 as a web-server ( Apache/1.3.6)
> I have several hosts some with 0.5G and some with 128M In all of them have
> memory
Yes, it requires java.
As seen from lynx : Sorry, your browser doesn't support applets. Make sure
Java is enabled.
Personally, I don't use, want, or have a Java enabled web browser.
-- Ors.
On 14 Jan 2000, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I also sugest
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Ury Segal wrote:
> "Ralph S. Birnbaum" wrote:
>
> > It's kind of bizarre actually. It's not that the list is unfriendly to
> > newbies, as is evidenced by the list's help towards Dorit Ben
> > Shalom. Or is it only friendly towards female newbies?
>
> About that, I only sugg
If you're looking for a full backup solution (daily backups, indexing,
etc ..), I'd try amanda, at www.amanda.org.
They did a very good job --- especially for multi platform clients.
-- Ors
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for information on backing up
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Dan "BUTTER" wrote:
> HI folks!
>
> As i started working with GTK+ and GDK i came upon the following problems..
> please help me...
>
You're not linking against the gtk+ libraries. RTFM, RTFM, RTFM.
-- Ors.
> THANx
>
>
Thank you, michael.
now the entire world can sleep soundly tonight, knowing that _you_, above
all people, are going to download it.
Who's the next person to go "Me too ! Me too!" ?
For those of you that wonder (as featured on /.), there's nothing
special about winlinux --- just another umsdos
On Sun, 26 Sep 1999, Adam Morrison wrote:
> > *every* computer connected to the net, or with users on it can be
> > compromised.
>
> That's misleading.
>
> For any security discussion not to become silly, the relevant threat model
> must be defined. The threat model in this case, as I see it,
On Sun, 26 Sep 1999, Aviram Jenik wrote:
> So if you don't trust your internal users - DON'T give them accounts. Going
> from regular user to root is trivial and only a matter of time (even if
> you're superadmin).
*every* computer connected to the net, or with users on it can be
compromised.
t
On Sun, 26 Sep 1999, Adam Morrison wrote:
>
> Sorry, but you are in trouble. If you have untrusted users on your system,
> then your security is broken by definition (and in practice).
>
I Disagree. There's no such thing as a perfectly secure system, but it's
quite possible to build a system w
2 points for the perl one-liner, 0 points for a good solution.
Ever seen situations in which xdm/startx runs at the end of rc.local ?
The correct answer (as someone already stated), is boot to single user
mode ..
Ors
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Gaal Yahas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 04:08:49PM
(Vadim, since you don't follow linux-il, I won't apologise for the double
post this time )v
Arrrgh. For the veteran among us, I would like to point out
that this list actually had people with common sense (Which isn't common
at all, btw).
Vadim - This will be a *very* good time to pu
(Vadik, I don't know if you follow linux-il -- if you do, apologies for
the double post.)
Vadik - Any ideas why that was allowed to pass through the filter ? afair,
no posts over 64kb, or something like that.
Hetz Beh Hamo, , Would you please tell me
what caused you to spam the several hundered
Not having the basic knowledge of what fields in df on the machines you
admin mean, mailing a *LINUX* list about it, and not even marking the
subject as OffTopic ?
Can someone lend me a pickaxe for a moment ?
Ors. Not even *starting* to rant about clueless admins and clueless
institutes.
On Tu
Not yet another time. In hope of ending this thread right here :
man procmailrc/procmailex
Setup a recipe based on the ``Sender'' in the envelope (that's that I do).
The current list setup is fine, and will not / should not be changed.
Please, let's keep it at that ..
--Ors
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999,
This thread now revolves around stories about potatoes, and dictionary
entries. Don't you think it's time this goes OFF linux-il ?
Ors
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Ben Nes Michael wrote:
> All you say its correct. But !!! you didn't understood what i wrote, and this remind
> me the story about how potat
Dear Nezer.Zaidenberg,
Looking up, I saw the name of this mailing list. Unless your mail was
emant to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and by some freak chance (Freak electrical
storm, perhaps ?) it arrived here, One would wonder why do you need
to disturb this list with *Silly* questions about openbsd (not t
> if you have and IDE drive as the primary master, then you should have
> entries in /dev - /dev/hda0 /dev/hda1 /dev/hda2 and so on.. RedHat put's
> them there. if you don't have any, you simple need to create the
> appropriatefiles there (using cat or something). on the RedHat CD you
> should be
do you think that that comfort, which can mostly (if not totally)
maintained, is worth the price of being used for spam relaying ? (not to
mention the cost and hassle for the server administrators themselves).
Also, most of the GUI clients (l)users use, check for mail on startup, so
most of those
> what's RBL ?
MAPS RBL, Mail Abuse Prevention System - Realtime Blackhole List.
It's a system from creating intentional network outages for the purpose of
limiting spam mail. Basically, they keep a DB of systems which are known
to be spammers-friendly, keep an open relay, etc ..
There are rul
Hi,
the "Right" way to allow such open relay is use some sort of
authentication (That's what POP before SMTP is for), rather then keep an
open relay. Having an open relay around will get you RBLed in no time ...
check www.sendmail.org (and probably maps.vix.com, afair), for more
informati
I guess that erez doron meant 'xhost +localhost', and not xauth ...
If I understood correctly - the problem occurs during the _startup_ of
XWindows and has nothing to do with the display access lists ...
Ors
On Wed, 5 May 1999, Erez Doron wrote:
> Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> >
> > Erez Doron <[
First, the mac supports samba using a 3rd party client called "Dave"
(search for it - I don't have an exact URL here).
If you want to provide appletalk services from the linux side, you
can either use CAP or netatalk. For heavy load i'd suggest taking the
patched version of netatalk (netatalk-
any good linux (both client and server) LDAP implementations ?
Ors
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Ariel Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Mike wrote:
>
> NIS/NIS+/LDAP
>
> --Ariel
>
> > Hello.
> > Is there a way to configure linux not to use her own user database ?
> > I mean something like Nt PDC
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
> OS>> spam. As to why you encountered this error --- Dial-up users aren't
> OS>> ``supposed'' to send email _directly_ from their (dynamic) connection.
>
> I did this routinely when I used dialup, and it always was OK. Local qmail
> coll
Ok, here goes. the MAPS project is an attempt to reduce the amount of
spam. As to why you encountered this error --- Dial-up users aren't
``supposed'' to send email _directly_ from their (dynamic) connection.
There are several other reasons to that, mainly is the fact that you don't
want replies
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Mike wrote:
> Hi.
> why did it occour ?
Because you're a clueless idiot ?
Do you even _bother_ to try and find out the answer yourself before you
rush and post your yet-another-whine about why things don't work for you ?
Some people shouldn't be allowed to use computers
30 matches
Mail list logo
