Oleg Goldshmidt wrote on Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 17:00:40 +0300:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > Sure. It's a zsh-specific syntax for an anonymous function with
> > arguments. In effect it's an anonymous block. For example:
> >
> > % (){ printf "$1\n" 04 } "%s"
> > 04
> > % (){ printf "$1\n" 04 }
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Sure. It's a zsh-specific syntax for an anonymous function with
> arguments. In effect it's an anonymous block. For example:
>
> % (){ printf "$1\n" 04 } "%s"
> 04
> % (){ printf "$1\n" 04 } "%d"
> 4
> % (){ printf "$1\n" 04 } "%e"
> 4.00e+00
>
> In interactiv
Michael Shiloh wrote on Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 16:36:35 -0700:
>
>
> On 08/18/2013 02:08 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Some of the odd corners of shell syntax are quite useful in interactive
>> usage. For example:
>>
>> % (){ foo $1 bar } 24
>> to run a command several times (recalling it from history
I would also recommend checking Google Cloud print. You can install it
on any Linux server (even headless), and then you can use it from
anywhere.
See here: http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=2906017
תודה,
חץ בן חמו
"חץ ביז"- שרותי פרילאנס לניהול ותחזוקת שרתי Linux ופתרונות ויר
Hi,
Thanks to all for your replies. Based on them and reviews, I've decided on
an HP Officejet Pro 8600+ (710 NIS, picking it up this evening). Will let
the honorable forum know if I find any surprises with this, for better or
worse.
Cheers,
Rony
___
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Geoffrey S. Mendelson
wrote:
> If you download the CORPORATE windows drivers for your HP printer you get it
> without the bloatware.
True, but even the HP corporate drivers tend to be big, slow and have
a fairly complex installation procedure compared to Linux.
E
On 8/19/2013 10:35 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Beyond the obvious (cups, x/sane), HPLIP toolbox more or less mirror's
the HP Window toolbox minus the all the bloatware and in most cases
the printer simply works out of the box.
If you download the CORPORATE windows drivers for your HP printer you
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Omer Zak wrote:
>[SNIP]
> I would say that today it's "anything but HP" - unless things changed
>[/SNIP]
I must admit that my experience couldn't be any different.
I've got a large number of HP printers both at work and at home, most
of them MFP (multi function p
