On 07/29/2012 02:12 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> So if the disk hardware fails after close() returns but before the OS
> caches are flushed...
It is not part of close(2)'s job description to protect against this
scenario. If you want to protect against this scenario, use sync(2).
Shachar
--
Shac
Shachar Shemesh wrote on Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 09:56:40 +0300:
> On 07/27/2012 02:52 PM, Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> >
> > (as mentioned earlier, the "no space left" could just as well happen
> > after the file was closed, so I don't mind that much it's not reported
> > on a close())
> >
> Ehm, no.
>
BTW - everyone here keeps assuming that close(2) is called on disk files,
what about other types of file descriptors (sockets, pipes, character and
block devices, "virtual filesystem" files)? How would you adjust your
answers for that case?
On 28 July 2012 16:56, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 07/
