On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:23:38PM +0200, Raz wrote:
> http://sos-linux.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sos-linux/LinuxHebrew/gitcourse/
>
> To those who are too lazy to read git-pro in english, I have translated
> git-pro important parts
> to hebrew.
1. Great!
2. But why that choice of version contr
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-04/msg01429.html
I do have three suggestions for you:
>
> 1) The current way to tell the compiler not to throw away
>apparently-unused data is __attribute__((used)), like this:
>
> static const char __attribute__((used)) rcs_sccs_id[] =
> "$Id: @(#)
"Nadav Har'El" writes:
> #if (__GNUC__ >= 4) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ > 4)
> #define USED(x) x __attribute__((used))
> #else
> #define USED(x) x
> #endif
> #define IDENT(x) static const char USED(foo_src_id[]) = x;
>
> and then in each file just do
> #include "ident
Shachar Shemesh wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 22:47:49 +0200:
> On 10/17/2011 10:29 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> >> - did you try
> >> changing that to:
> >> static const volatile char foo_src_id[] = "$Id$";
> > Hmm... "const volatile" hadn't occurred to me before, but I have just
> > tried it and
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> Just tested it myself. It does, indeed, not work. I wonder why?
> Seems like it SHOULD work. After all, that's what volatile is for,
> right?
I suspected that const was more important than volatile, but it looks
(after I removed const) that what overrules volatile is t
On 10/17/2011 10:29 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
>> - did you try
>> changing that to:
>> static const volatile char foo_src_id[] = "$Id$";
> Hmm... "const volatile" hadn't occurred to me before, but I have just
> tried it and it did not work.
Just tested it myself. It does, indeed, not work. I wonde
Shachar Shemesh writes:
> Leaving aside the question of whether that is a good idea
This saved my butt enough times in the past that I think it is ;-)
> - did you try
> changing that to:
> static const volatile char foo_src_id[] = "$Id$";
Hmm... "const volatile" hadn't occurred to me before, b
Baruch Siach writes:
> The -O2, as well as -O and -Os, gcc options enable a set of specific
> optimizations that can each be turned off. The full list is at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.1/gcc/Optimize-Options.html. Just
> go over this list and disable each optimization, until you find
"Nadav Har'El" writes:
> In any case, because there was always a fear that the compiler might
> optimize these out, someone invented a new directive, #ident, as in:
>
> #ident "$Id$"
This has always been there, but it has never been standard, AFAIK. It
is not a GCC extension, either. Most prepro
On 10/17/2011 06:29 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a gcc-related question. Problematic platform is Fedora 15 with
> gcc 4.6.1, as well as Fedora 14 with gcc 4.5.1.
>
> I am used to keeping RCS/CVS/SVN keywords (e.g., $Id$) in all my code.
> In the case of C/C++ this normally amounts to
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about "Newer gcc swallow version
control keywords":
> static const char foo_src_id[] = "$Id$";
I remember many years ago (when I was probably still using SCCS with its %..%
macros, and SCCS's what(1) instead of ident(1)), there was already an argument
o
Hi Oleg,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 06:29:58PM +0200, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
...
> Now, put the above line in a C or C++ file, say foo.cc, and do the
> following:
>
> $ g++ -g -O2 foo.cc -c -o foo.o
> $ ident foo.o
> foo.o:
> $Id: foo.cc 673 2011-10-17 09:48:11Z oleg $
>
> This works up to an
2011/10/17 Guy Tetruashvyly
> **
> On 10/17/2011 01:16 AM, Tom Goren wrote :
>
> They have a 'free' edition:
>
> http://www.nomachine.com/select-package.php?os=linux&id=1
>
>
> That is true, but the free version will act as a terminal server , rather
> then presenting you your "real " desktop.
Hi,
I have a gcc-related question. Problematic platform is Fedora 15 with
gcc 4.6.1, as well as Fedora 14 with gcc 4.5.1.
I am used to keeping RCS/CVS/SVN keywords (e.g., $Id$) in all my code.
In the case of C/C++ this normally amounts to
static const char foo_src_id[] = "$Id$";
in the source c
On 10/17/2011 01:16 AM, Tom Goren wrote :
They have a 'free' edition:
http://www.nomachine.com/select-package.php?os=linux&id=1
That is true, but the free version will act as a terminal
server , rather then presentin
They have a 'free' edition:
http://www.nomachine.com/select-package.php?os=linux&id=1
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Guy Tetruashvyly wrote:
> **
> On 10/17/2011 12:21 AM, Tom Goren wrote
>
>
> You mentioned FreeNX but from my experience the proprietary version is
> still light years ahead
16 matches
Mail list logo
