Re: Does anyone know whether the following can be trusted?

2010-09-19 Thread Omer Zak
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 07:09 +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010, Omer Zak wrote about "Does anyone know whether the > following can be trusted?": > > There is an exploit of 64-bit Linux kernel, which leaves behind a > > backdoor usable even after the kernel has been patched. > > > >

Re: Does anyone know whether the following can be trusted?

2010-09-19 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010, Omer Zak wrote about "Does anyone know whether the following can be trusted?": > There is an exploit of 64-bit Linux kernel, which leaves behind a > backdoor usable even after the kernel has been patched. > > To check whether your PC is infected, the diagnose-2010-3081 tool

Does anyone know whether the following can be trusted?

2010-09-19 Thread Omer Zak
There is an exploit of 64-bit Linux kernel, which leaves behind a backdoor usable even after the kernel has been patched. To check whether your PC is infected, the diagnose-2010-3081 tool can be used (see https://www.ksplice.com/uptrack/cve-2010-3081.ssi.xhtml for links to binary and to source).

TelFOSS Soliciting a Talk about Automated Software Testing

2010-09-19 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi all, following on Sawyer's talk about version control, I've been thinking of doing another talk about a different software best practice: automated software testing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_automation Since I'm a big practitioner and advocate of writing automated tests and test- d