Question about VOIP and Faxes

2010-01-20 Thread Ori Berger
Dear Linux-IL, I've been using asterisk, a pstn->sip DID (didww) and a sip->pstn termination (grnvoip) for the last year, and it's been working very well. I'm about to purchase[1] an Epson Artisan 810, which can also work as a Fax, and I would like to put it to that use. (Oh, and I'm located

Re: better platform for virtualization

2010-01-20 Thread Amos Shapira
2010/1/20 Muli Ben-Yehuda : > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:04:31AM +0200, Etzion Bar-Noy wrote: >> KVM was designed, and is focused on VDI - desktop virtualization, >> being the focus of Kumranet in the past. RedHat cannot maintain two >> virtualization platforms. > > Again, that's wrong. KVM was not

Re: Debian OpenSSL with FIPS

2010-01-20 Thread Noam Meltzer
Hi Noam, Currently we're using mod_nss and we're seriously considering using mod_ssl with FIPS compliant openssl (which we'll compile ourselves). btw, mod_nss is not in a great place either (FIPS wise). The versions certified are not very recent and there are newer versions for mos_nss which are

Re: Debian OpenSSL with FIPS

2010-01-20 Thread Noam Rathaus
Hi Noam, So the outcome of your research was to move to mod_nss instead of mod_ssl for FIPS? That would be quite "weird" as OpenSSL should now "natively" be FIPS compatible Especially with newer packages than openssl-0.9.8j being available (0.9.8k on debian/sid) On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:41 PM

Re: Debian OpenSSL with FIPS

2010-01-20 Thread Noam Meltzer
Hi Noam, The RPM you have found is not FIPS compliant. Please see below: 1. I recently googled a lot and digged RedHat website. The only place RHEL is FIPS compliant is with mod_nss (apache SSL with netscape engine.) http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-19187 I wish to be wrong here. It'll save m

Re: Debian OpenSSL with FIPS

2010-01-20 Thread Noam Rathaus
Hi Noam, I have seen several threads on RedHat and CentOS compatibility with FIPS, and some of these mention openssl-fips-0.9.8e, so I assumed such a package existed. If you did some googling you would find that: http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/12835601/com/openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5.i686.

Re: better platform for virtualization

2010-01-20 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:04:31AM +0200, Etzion Bar-Noy wrote: > PV drivers were released by Oracle, who run their own virtualization > platform based on XenCommunity. > > KVM is wasteful and requires VT support even for Linux machines. Not > only that, but its virtualized hardware is legacy old

Debian OpenSSL with FIPS

2010-01-20 Thread Noam Rathaus
Hi, I noticed that RedHat and CentOS has special packages of OpenSSL that have FIPS complied into it. Does anyone know where can I locate such a thing for Debian? Thanks, Noam. ___ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.a

Re: SIP provider questions.

2010-01-20 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Rami Addady wrote: Hi, Spikko work also using IAX. You can find more information in this blog: http://gilpalmon.com/2008/08/25/spikko-asterisk-free-iax2-to-pstn-in-israel/ Thanks, that's the dead link we were talking about. BTW, although it works fine for i

Re: better platform for virtualization

2010-01-20 Thread Amos Shapira
2010/1/20 Gilad Ben-Yossef : > Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: > > Jonathan Ben Avraham writes: > > > > Hi Gilad, > Why do you recommend KVM over XEN? Have you fiddled with both? Are > there particular problems with XEN? > > > Apart from the fact that XEN is paravirtualization technology and > running a mi

Re: better platform for virtualization

2010-01-20 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Jonathan Ben Avraham writes: Hi Gilad, Why do you recommend KVM over XEN? Have you fiddled with both? Are there particular problems with XEN? Apart from the fact that XEN is paravirtualization technology and running a mission-critical Windows DomU is possible