Re: Desktop effects stopped working on Ubuntu 9.04

2009-10-13 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On Oct 13, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Oron Peled wrote: On Tuesday, 13 בOctober 2009 20:29:07 Ori Idan wrote: Thank you very much. I had to delete the display section and restart X Generally speaking, the Xorg developers recommend working without an /etc/X11/xorg.conf at all (assuming your distributi

Re: Desktop effects stopped working on Ubuntu 9.04

2009-10-13 Thread Oron Peled
On Tuesday, 13 בOctober 2009 20:29:07 Ori Idan wrote: > Thank you very much. > I had to delete the display section and restart X Generally speaking, the Xorg developers recommend working without an /etc/X11/xorg.conf at all (assuming your distribution package a recent Xorg version + drivers). >

Re: Desktop effects stopped working on Ubuntu 9.04

2009-10-13 Thread Ori Idan
Thank you very much. I had to delete the display section and restart X -- Ori Idan On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Ori Berger wrote: > Ori Idan wrote: > >> I have an Ubuntu 9.04 laptop with Intel 945 graphics adapter. >> Desktop effects worked until this morning when I connected it to an >>

Re: Desktop effects stopped working on Ubuntu 9.04

2009-10-13 Thread Ori Berger
Ori Idan wrote: I have an Ubuntu 9.04 laptop with Intel 945 graphics adapter. Desktop effects worked until this morning when I connected it to an external monitor. After disconnecting the external monitor and restarting the laptop, desktop effects stopped working. Does someone have an idea how

Re: Desktop effects stopped working on Ubuntu 9.04

2009-10-13 Thread Ori Idan
I get the following output: Checking for Xgl: not present. xset q doesn't reveal the location of the log file. Using fallback /var/log/Xorg.0.log Detected PCI ID for VGA: Checking for texture_from_pixmap: not present. Trying again with indirect rendering: Checking for texture_from_pixmap: present.

Re: Desktop effects stopped working on Ubuntu 9.04

2009-10-13 Thread Shay Ohayon
what happens if you run ' compiz --replace ' from the terminal? 2009/10/13 Ori Idan : > I have an Ubuntu 9.04 laptop with Intel 945 graphics adapter. > Desktop effects worked until this morning when I connected it to an external > monitor. > After disconnecting the external monitor and restarting

Desktop effects stopped working on Ubuntu 9.04

2009-10-13 Thread Ori Idan
I have an Ubuntu 9.04 laptop with Intel 945 graphics adapter. Desktop effects worked until this morning when I connected it to an external monitor. After disconnecting the external monitor and restarting the laptop, desktop effects stopped working. Does someone have an idea how to reenable them? -

Re: jffs2 q

2009-10-13 Thread Erez D
i do not have mtd, only image thanks, erez. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > Hi Erez, > > > Erez D wrote: > > i am compiling a new jffs2 image for an embedded device, and i get an > error saying my erase size is wrong. > how do i determine what is my erase size ? (so

Re: jffs2 q

2009-10-13 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Ori Idan wrote: The exact size depends on the actual device being used. Look at the device data sheet to see what is it's block size. Of course, but assuming he has a target board that works with a specific JFFS2 image, he can find out the erase block size using the procedure I outlined *for

Re: jffs2 q

2009-10-13 Thread Ori Idan
The exact size depends on the actual device being used. Look at the device data sheet to see what is it's block size. -- Ori Idan 2009/10/13 Gilad Ben-Yossef > Hi Erez, > > > Erez D wrote: > > i am compiling a new jffs2 image for an embedded device, and i get an > error saying my erase siz

Re: jffs2 q

2009-10-13 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Hi Erez, Erez D wrote: i am compiling a new jffs2 image for an embedded device, and i get an error saying my erase size is wrong. how do i determine what is my erase size ? (so i can compare to a jffs2 file that works) is there a utility that can give info on jffs2 images, like what is th

Re: UBUNTU JAVA problem.

2009-10-13 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:35:44PM +0200, geoffrey mendelson wrote: > > On Oct 13, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > >> Sorry, but I don't get it: Why do they use the Gnu Java instead of the >> openJDK? Fedora installs OpenJDK by default.. > > > > I did not "get it" either. One minute I'm

Re: UBUNTU JAVA problem.

2009-10-13 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On Oct 13, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: Sorry, but I don't get it: Why do they use the Gnu Java instead of the openJDK? Fedora installs OpenJDK by default.. I did not "get it" either. One minute I'm happily running Sun's JRE at the 1.6 level and the next, a link was changed an

Re: UBUNTU JAVA problem.

2009-10-13 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 03:34:40AM +0200, geoffrey mendelson wrote: > Ubuntu users: a random update tonight changed the link in /etc/ > alternatives You should not update this link directly. Use update-alternatives. Some alternative links are grouped together. For instance: $ /usr/sbin/update-

Re: UBUNTU JAVA problem.

2009-10-13 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Sorry, but I don't get it: Why do they use the Gnu Java instead of the openJDK? Fedora installs OpenJDK by default.. Hetz On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:34 AM, geoffrey mendelson < geoffreymendel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ubuntu users: a random update tonight changed the link in /etc/alternatives > from