Amos,
1) Set your Display name in Gmail :) it shows as empty
2) I am using 5.8, and the documents for 5.10 and 5.8 aren't that different,
at least not in solving my problem
On Thursday 01 January 2009 02:01:14 amos.shap...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I am using the 'threads' library that has been (rewr
> I am using the 'threads' library that has been (rewritten) provided in
Perl
> and appears to be ?stable?
>
> My difficulty is in piping the 'kill' instruction from the parent process
to
> the 'threaded' process.
>
> It appears not to work.
>
> Anyone with some insight, or sample?
>
> Befo
I tested on my debian (lenny) machine and have the same problem. A CentOS
5.2 machine with version 3.1.8 of 'at' and GMT as the timezone did not have
this problem.
Chaim
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Avraham Rosenberg wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is the output of atq:
> avraham6e32:/tmp$ atq
> 48
Hi,
Here is the output of atq:
avraham6e32:/tmp$ atq
48 Wed Dec 31 21:40:00 2008 a avraham
52 Fri Jan 1 06:00:00 2010 a avraham
49 Fri Jan 1 05:00:00 2010 a avraham
51 Fri Jan 1 06:45:00 2010 a avraham
The command, corresponding to the last line was:
at -m -f fvivaceRec-2 0
Hi,
I am using the 'threads' library that has been (rewritten) provided in Perl
and appears to be ?stable?
My difficulty is in piping the 'kill' instruction from the parent process to
the 'threaded' process.
It appears not to work.
Anyone with some insight, or sample?
Before someone says RTF
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> 2008/12/31 ik :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had a very small and bad bug that I discovered today.
> >
> > I use strftime to format a date, and I accidentally used the %g option
> > rather then %y.
> > The difference is that %g is returning the year of
2008/12/31 Noam Meltzer :
>> Feature, not a bug!
>
> Bitchure, not a feature :)
>
I'd actually call that a feature with six legs :)
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
ا-ب-ت-ث-ج-ح-خ-د-ذ-ر-ز-س-ش-ص-ض-ط-ظ-ع-غ-ف-ق-ك-ل-
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
> Feature, not a bug!
>
Bitchure, not a feature :)
2008/12/31 ik :
> Hi,
>
> I had a very small and bad bug that I discovered today.
>
> I use strftime to format a date, and I accidentally used the %g option
> rather then %y.
> The difference is that %g is returning the year of the week (2009 this
> week), while %y return the year of today (2008).
Next Sunday (!), January 4th at 18:30, Haifux will gather to hear
Cathy Malmrose (from the bay area) talk about
Linux Hardware
Abstract
Building hardware to run a Linux distro used to be quite tricky,
involving plenty of trial and error with components while filing bug
reports in various
Hi,
I had a very small and bad bug that I discovered today.
I use strftime to format a date, and I accidentally used the %g option
rather then %y.
The difference is that %g is returning the year of the week (2009 this
week), while %y return the year of today (2008).
So I wanted to warn everyone,
11 matches
Mail list logo
