Ghiora Drori wrote:
I happen to disagree and I can say so even if any of you do not like it.
This does not mean I have to fix Shachar's problem or even look at at it,
If you are looking for a fight I am not interested.
The thing to take to heart is that if you are looking to convert anyone
(and
Hi,
This is the beginning of Shachar's posting:
Quote ( bold mine):
Libtool is a* great tool*, and it fits nicely with automake and autoconf,
making it extremely simple to just take a new project, write a few (less
than 10) lines to instructions, and get a project that already builds static
and sh
Hi all,
A startup located at Rehovot is looking for a programmer with the following
spec:
- Software Engineer
- Excellent knowledge in C/C++ including STL and OOD.
- Professional background in machine developing and/or Imaging.
- Excellent knowledge in multi-threading.
- At least 5 years of
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:54:34AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Ghiora Drori wrote:
>> Use cmake. It is much better then the gnu tool builder stuff. And it
>> is free.
> 2. How does cmake handle this problem differently?
I'll note that with all of your cmake advocacy, you still haven't
answ
Hi all!
On Wednesday 24 September 2008, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Ghiora Drori wrote:
> > Having Used cmake (I have no association with them) I found it much
> > easier to handle build systems with the cmake.
> > then with the autotool chain which I did get to meddle with quite a
> > bit in the pa
