Rafi Gordon wrote:
Hello,
It has no less then 7 (or even 8) contributers, with Karim, Jon Masters and your
truly >as the main co-authors and what I really like about it is that each
contributing author >wrote about a specific topics that he is really qualified to
write about.
Out
On Sunday 08 June 2008, Shlomi Loubaton wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 3. The infamous Ubuntu bug #1 is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1
> > it reads "Microsoft has a majority market share" and is marked as
> > critical. If it's a softwar
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. The infamous Ubuntu bug #1 is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 it
> reads "Microsoft has a majority market share" and is marked as critical. If
> it's a software problem with Ubuntu, then I am a Jackalope.
Did you
> to me this means as if OpenMoko expect Qtopia will be the more popular
> chice and GTK is that just for conveniance, am I wrong?
>
I will ask on the OpenMoko list and get back to you.
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש
Quoting Ira Abramov, from the post of Sat, 07 Jun:
>
> I'm not fluent in the Openmoko-verse, but I think it seems you are
> right, it's GtK and Qtopia. however according to this (out of date?)
> page, the base apps are GTK and not ETK, so which is right?
> http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Why_Not_QT
2008/6/7 Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Tue, 03 Jun:
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Ira Abramov
>> >
>> > I have no idea where that comes from. "apt-get autoremove" takes care of
>> > packages that are no longer dependent upon (or is that only in sid?)
Quoting Dotan Cohen, from the post of Sat, 07 Jun:
> >> You try running two toolkits at once on a 400 mHz processor with 128
> >> MB RAM, tell me how well it runs, then we'll discuss the option.
> >
> > a. this was exactly my point about adding in QT support, it made no
> > sense adding a fourth to
Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Tue, 03 Jun:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Ira Abramov
> >
> > I have no idea where that comes from. "apt-get autoremove" takes care of
> > packages that are no longer dependent upon (or is that only in sid?).
>
> But can you mark a package as "nothing de
2008/6/7 Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> You try running two toolkits at once on a 400 mHz processor with 128
>> MB RAM, tell me how well it runs, then we'll discuss the option.
>
> a. this was exactly my point about adding in QT support, it made no
> sense adding a fourth toolkit to a platform
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Fri, 06 Jun:
> Ira Abramov wrote:
>>
>> In fact, I would not be
>> surprised if they take over the Symbian market within a year or two as
>> well. the iPhone will survive, but I think OpenMoko is too slow and
>> heavy to stay afloat in the coming flood.
>>
Quoting Dotan Cohen, from the post of Fri, 06 Jun:
> 2008/6/6 Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Quoting Dotan Cohen, from the post of Tue, 03 Jun:
> >> decision. Maybe the ETK/GTK/Qt decision is not arbitrary, but from
> >> here it certainly seems so.
> >
> > don't blow it out of proportions eit
11 matches
Mail list logo
